Laserfiche WebLink
State of Hawai f v. Rene M. Mansho <br /> Enclosed is a copy of the Complaint and plea form in State of Hawai f v. Rene M. <br /> Mansho. A "complaint" is the document which formally charges a criminal defendant <br /> with a crime or crimes. The plea form indicates what charges a criminal defendant <br /> pleads guilty to. Although the attached letter to the plea form indicates it is <br /> "confidential," the plea form and attachments become public records, since our laws <br /> require all prosecutorial activities (with the exception of juvenile cases and grand jury <br /> proceedings) be conducted in open court. <br /> Defendant Mansho was prosecuted and convicted of two felonies, Theft in the First <br /> Degree, and Theft in the Second Degree. Both felonies are punishable by up to 10 and <br /> 5 years in prison, respectfully. Both felonies are also "probationable" offenses. It will <br /> be up to the judge to determine what sentence Mansho receives. She faces the <br /> possibility of either probation or 10 years in prison (but not both) at her upcoming <br /> sentencing hearing. Even if Mansho is granted probation by the Court, she may serve <br /> a jail term as a condition of her probation. Again, this is wholly discretionary with the <br /> court. <br /> Count I of the Complaint alleges Mansho, in a continuing course of conduct, utilized her <br /> council staff members to perform campaign-related tasks, while on City and County <br /> "work time." The prosecution utilized expert consultants to calculate the total amount of <br /> public funds misappropriated during the stated time period. This total was well in <br /> excess of the $20,000 threshold for the class B felony offense of Theft in the First <br /> Degree. <br /> Count II of the Complaint alleges Mansho utilized monies from her campaign fund <br /> (which legally belongs to the State of Hawai`i), for the payment of private expenses, <br /> such as her cellular telephone bill. The total misappropriated over the stated time <br /> period was in excess of$300, the threshold amount for the class C felony offense of <br /> Theft in the Second Degree. <br /> This case illustrates many important points: <br /> • Our criminal laws provide the statute of limitations may be tolled (suspended) <br /> where fraud is an element of the offense. The statute of limitations is a law in <br /> our state which says after the passage of a certain period of time (from the date <br /> the crime was committed), the prosecution cannot charge you with a crime. <br /> However, the law also says in cases where some "fraud" was committed by he <br /> perpetrator, "the clock stops running," and the prosecution is given additional <br /> time to bring charges. In Mansho's case, many of her activities were conducted <br /> in a fraudulent (secret) manner. Thus, as seen in Count II of the Complaint, the <br /> prosecution was able to go as far back as 1994 to capture the misconduct. <br /> • The Hawaii Penal Code has applicable provisions which cover political <br /> -2- <br />