Laserfiche WebLink
***FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER*** <br /> VIII . <br /> Finally, Oceanside advances a meritorious argument <br /> that, because `Oceanside was not the plaintiff in [Condemnation <br /> 1, ] " it should not be held liable for damages under HRS S 101-27 . <br /> Appellant has not moved to recover damages against Oceanside, and <br /> it does not appear that Oceanside, as a third-party defendant, <br /> can be held liable for damages under HRS § 101-27, as it did not <br /> institute the condemnation proceedings . Hence, damages are <br /> recoverable only against the County and not against Oceanside . <br /> IX. <br /> In accordance with the foregoing, Appellant is entitled <br /> to recover the amount requested in its corrected lodestar, less <br /> (1) the amounts claimed in the 6/17/08 and 6/23/08 entries <br /> regarding the County' s Application to Transfer, (2) the amount <br /> requested for those entries related to (a) supplementing the <br /> Record on Appeal, and (b) preparing for and attending oral <br /> argument in this court, and (3) the amount of pre-judgment <br /> interest on those fees . Further, Appellant is awarded the amount <br /> of costs requested less ( 1) costs associated with legal research; <br /> (2) messenger/courier fees; and (3) one-half of the claimed <br /> photocopying costs . As to the fees and costs claimed for <br /> preparing the Request for fees and costs and the subsequent <br /> Response, those fees and costs are denied. <br /> Therefore, as to fees, Appellant is entitled to recover <br /> $25, 370 . 55 as follows : <br /> 34 <br />