My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-10-01_Jack_Thomas_v_COH_-_Order_Granting_Defendants_Motion_for_Summary_Judgment_and_Remanding_State_Law_Claims
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Court Documents
>
2008-10-01_Jack_Thomas_v_COH_-_Order_Granting_Defendants_Motion_for_Summary_Judgment_and_Remanding_State_Law_Claims
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2011 4:27:56 PM
Creation date
7/15/2011 4:26:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 1:07-cv-00251-JMS-LEK Document 52 Filed 10/01/2008 Page 1 of 17 <br /> IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT <br /> FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII <br /> JACK THOMAS, ) CIVIL NO. 07-00251 JMS/LEK <br /> Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING <br /> DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR <br /> VS. ) SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND <br /> REMANDING STATE LAW <br /> COUNTY OF HAWAII; JAY ) CLAIMS <br /> KIMURA; JEFFERSON R. ) <br /> MALATE; and DOES 1-100, ) <br /> Defendants. ) <br /> ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY <br /> JUDGMENT AND REMANDING STATE LAW CLAIMS <br /> Plaintiff Jack Thomas ("Plaintiff") alleges that Defendants County of <br /> Hawaii ("County"), Jay Kimura ("Kimura"), and Jefferson R. Malate ("Malate") <br /> (collectively, "Defendants") improperly filed a criminal charge against him for <br /> violating a Temporary Restraining Order ("TRO") that a judge in a civil action had <br /> previously dismissed. Plaintiff currently asserts claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. <br /> § 1983 for violation of Plaintiff's Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights, and <br /> state law claims of malicious prosecution and abuse of process. <br /> Currently before the court is Defendants' Motion for Summary <br /> Judgment on Plaintiff's § 1983 claim, in which they argue that Malate and Kimura <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.