My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-10-01_Jack_Thomas_v_COH_-_Order_Granting_Defendants_Motion_for_Summary_Judgment_and_Remanding_State_Law_Claims
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Court Documents
>
2008-10-01_Jack_Thomas_v_COH_-_Order_Granting_Defendants_Motion_for_Summary_Judgment_and_Remanding_State_Law_Claims
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2011 4:27:56 PM
Creation date
7/15/2011 4:26:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case 1:07-cv-00251-JMS-LEK Document 52 Filed 10/01/2008 Page 6 of 17 <br /> B. Procedural Background <br /> On April 12, 2007, Plaintiff filed his Complaint in the State of Hawaii <br /> Circuit Court of the Third Circuit, alleging claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 <br /> for violation of Plaintiff's First, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, Ninth, and Fourteenth <br /> Amendment rights, and state law claims of malicious prosecution and abuse of <br /> process. On May 15, 2007, Defendants removed the case to this court. <br /> On October 9, 2007, Defendants moved for judgment on the <br /> pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) and to dismiss for <br /> failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) on the basis that they have no liability <br /> under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because both Kimura and Malate have absolute immunity <br /> for their actions taken in this case. On December 10, 2007, the court denied <br /> Defendants' Motion without prejudice so that the parties could present a fuller <br /> record to allow the court to rule on Defendants' claims of absolute immunity. <br /> On August 13, 2008, Defendants filed the present Motion for <br /> Summary Judgment. On September 11, 2008, Plaintiff filed his Opposition,s and <br /> Defendants filed their Reply on September 22, 2008. A hearing was held on <br /> September 29, 2008. <br /> 5 The court struck Plaintiff's Concise State of Facts filed on September 11, 2008 for <br /> failure to comply with Local Rules. Plaintiff filed an Amended Concise Statement on September <br /> 16, 2008. <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.