My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-01-14_Agency_Appeal_-_Christopher_Yuen_vs_Board_of_Appeals
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Legal Opinions
>
2008-01-14_Agency_Appeal_-_Christopher_Yuen_vs_Board_of_Appeals
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2011 4:30:07 PM
Creation date
7/15/2011 4:28:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
was" <br /> served by rain catchment must have an average annual rainfall of not less than sixty inches and <br /> no more than six lots are allowed in rain catchment subdivisions. (ROA at 00062 - 00066, <br /> 00655.) Rule 22 became effective on February 25, 20061,pursuant to Chapter 91, HRS. <br /> 2. The Variance Application <br /> On December 21, 2006, Jin and Lu filed with the Planning Department in Kona an <br /> Application for Variance from the Subdivision Code seeking a variance from Section 23-84 <br /> (Water Supply) of the Hawaii County Code (hereinafter"Subdivision Code")to enable the <br /> subdivision of their 35.90-acre property into six lots: four 5-acre lots, one 6.5-acre lot, and <br /> one 7+-acre lot to be served by a private water catchment system (hereinafter"Variance <br /> Application"). (ROA at 000655.) By letter dated January 5, 2007, the Director acknowledged <br /> receipt of Jin and Lu's Variance Application and indicated that a decision would be rendered on <br /> or before February 19, 2007. (ROA at 00079.) <br /> Although the burden of proof was on Jin and Lu to affirmatively show in the Variance <br /> Application that the Property receives an average annual rainfall of not less than sixty inches as <br /> required by Rule 22 of the Planning Department Rules of Practice and Procedure (hereinafter <br /> "Rule 22") and that they otherwise met the requirements of Section 23-15 of the Subdivision <br /> Code to qualify for a variance from the water supply requirements of the Subdivision Code, Jin <br /> and Lu stated in their Variance Application that the sixty inch rainfall line utilized by the <br /> Planning Department in reviewing variance applications is located approximately"50 feet <br /> mauka" of the boundary of the Property, evidencing that the Property does not meet the rainfall <br /> requirement of Rule 22. (ROA at 00048, 00666.) <br /> 1 Although Findings of Fact No. 14 states that Rule 22 was enacted on February 15,2006,that is actually the date <br /> the rule was filed with the County Clerk. Section 91-4,Hawaii Revised Statutes,states that the rule becomes <br /> effective ten days after filing with the County Clerk;therefore,Rule 22 was enacted on February 25,2006. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.