My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-04-07_Bill 270_Ordinance_re_Office_of_Police_Oversight
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Legal Opinions
>
2008-04-07_Bill 270_Ordinance_re_Office_of_Police_Oversight
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2011 4:35:22 PM
Creation date
7/15/2011 4:33:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Honorable Brenda Ford <br /> April 7, 2008 <br /> Page 2 <br /> In late 2007, Mr. De Silva met with me concerning the present legislative <br /> effort. I informed Mr. De Silva (and subsequently informed Mr. Jacobson's office) <br /> that I believed improvements to the current system of police officer misconduct <br /> investigations was warranted. Although the creation of a new office or position <br /> within the County may not be the preference of our office, it was nonetheless <br /> important for this issue and proposed bill to be deliberated by the Council, as the <br /> promotion of transparency in our police department would benefit all involved. I <br /> informed Mr. De Silva it was not the desire of the Corporation Counsel to either <br /> lobby for or against this legislation. This is because under our laws, the <br /> Corporation Counsel represents not only the Council, but the Police Department <br /> and Police Commission as well. All parties would be best served if the <br /> Corporation Counsel simply provided legal counsel, as we are mandated to do. <br /> If the office took an active role in advocating for the passage or defeat of <br /> legislation beyond legal criteria, our Rules of Professional Conduct would <br /> necessarily require the retention of special counsel to avoid any conflict of <br /> interest. <br /> As expressed to Mr. De Silva and our Police Department and Police <br /> Commission clients, there is always room for improvement in any system of <br /> police misconduct investigations. Further, if it is the collective will of the Council <br /> that there is such a demonstrated need for a new office of oversight for our police <br /> department such that the voters should be called upon to decide, the Corporation <br /> Counsel would not advocate against such a collective effort by the Council. To <br /> this end, Councilman Jacobson is commended by our office for his effort in <br /> bringing this issue before the Council in a public venue, so that the Council may <br /> make an informed decision on the need for any Charter amendment, and the <br /> Police Department may be made aware of any specific problems either <br /> experienced or perceived by the public with respect to the misconduct of its <br /> police officers. <br /> Bill 209 <br /> Bill 209 seeks to amend the Hawaii County Charter (2000) (hereinafter <br /> "Charter") by creating an Office of Police Oversight and Complaints. In the <br /> preamble to the most recent draft of the bill, this amendment is necessitated by <br /> the "desire to create a civilian oversight mechanism for Hawai'i County" due to <br /> "years of frustration expressed by numerous elected officials, police officers, and <br /> residents that have had experiences with police that were less than satisfactory." <br /> At the first reading of this bill on March 24, 2008, there were five persons <br /> who offered public testimony. <br /> Tom Whittemore, a police commissioner from Council District 8 (Kailua- <br /> Kona), offered testimony as both a police commissioner (Mr. Whittemore serves <br /> as the Vice Chair of the Police Commission) and private citizen. Mr. Whittemore <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.