Laserfiche WebLink
Case 1:05-cv-00325-JMS-BMK Document 43 Filed 02/26/2008 Page 6 of 6 <br /> supporting arguments do not set forth any basis from which the court could <br /> construe that satisfactory legal grounds for Rule 60(b) relief have been presented. <br /> Plaintiff instead merely repeats arguments previously rejected by the court.4 <br /> III. CONCLUSION <br /> For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiff `s Motion to Vacate Judgment <br /> is DENIED. <br /> DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, February 25, 2008. <br /> 9s AT�s a,s TRca <br /> /s/J. Michael Seabright <br /> J. Michael Seabright <br /> z United States District Judge <br /> Ole <br /> H10T n kP <br /> Cole v. State of Hawaii, et al., Civ. No. 05-00325 JMS/BMK, Order Denying Plaintiff s Motion <br /> to Vacate the Order Granting Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended <br /> Complaint Filed on January 25, 2006. <br /> 4 Insofar as Plaintiff challenges the validity of the court's August 16, 2005 Order Granting <br /> Motions to Dismiss Complaint and Amended Complaint With Leave to Amend, he has not <br /> offered legal authority sufficient to cause the court to revisit its prior opinion. <br /> 6 <br />