My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-11-17_Motion_to_Dismiss_Petition_for_Declaratory_Ruling_re_Herron_Whitehead
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Court Documents
>
2006-11-17_Motion_to_Dismiss_Petition_for_Declaratory_Ruling_re_Herron_Whitehead
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2011 4:36:10 PM
Creation date
7/15/2011 4:35:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
More specifically, Petitioners are requesting the Board to issue a declaratory ruling on the <br /> following three issues: <br /> 1. "Pursuant to the Hawaii County Charter 13-20(a) and the Uniform <br /> Information Practices Act, HRS 92-F 11(b), Petitioners request that the Board of <br /> Appeals make a Declaratory Ruling declaring that the Planning Director must <br /> allow the public to have access to (to inspect and make copies of)its records <br /> regarding the processing of subdivisions, rezoning ordinance conditions, or other <br /> development matters, without exclusion of or removal of unprivileged documents <br /> from those files. . . ." <br /> See Petition at 30. <br /> 2. "Petitioners request that the Board of Appeals make a Declaratory Ruling <br /> declaring that, in reviewing subdivision applications, the Planning Director must <br /> require conformity with relevant specific provisions of the General Plan, and in <br /> the case of the Luala`i III subdivision, including insistence upon compliance with <br /> the "Connector Road" mandate, that is, Transportation Course of Action <br /> 13.2.5.6.2(g). Accordingly, the Planning Director must refrain from any further <br /> action on the Luala`i III subdivision, or any other development with the Town <br /> Center project, unless and until Parker Ranch agrees complete Phases 1 and 3 of <br /> the Connector Road according to the time schedule set forth in the Luala`i III <br /> Tentative Plan Approval letter. In the event that Parker Ranch/Kaomalo are <br /> unwilling to comply with this General Plan mandate—which simply implements <br /> the Connector Road provisions in Rezoning Ordinance 96-117." <br /> See Petition at 33. <br /> 3. "Petitioners request that the Board of Appeals make a Declaratory Ruling <br /> that the Planning Director does not have the authority to waive the "requirements <br /> of Rezoning Ordinance 96-117(M)(1)(b), which pursuant to the "adjacent <br /> development" timing trigger now requires construction of the Connector Road <br /> phases 1 and 3 in conjunction with the Luala`i III subdivision. The Planning <br /> Director must not take any further action on any of the Luala`i at Parker Ranch <br /> subdivision applications, or on any other proposed Town Center Development, <br /> unless and until Parker Ranch/Kaomalo commits to now complete Phases 1 and 3 <br /> of the Connector road, and acts in compliance with that obligation. The Planning <br /> Directory [sic] must stop accommodating this developer's avoidance of it [sic] <br /> Connector Road obligation and immediately require revision of the Luala`i III <br /> construction plans to show the infrastructure plans for Phases 1 and 3 of the <br /> Connector Road including the associated intersections, and otherwise administer <br /> this subdivision, including the requirement of bonding for road improvements, <br /> pursuant to the time frame set forth in the Planning Department's March 22, 2005 <br /> Luala`i III Tentative Approval letter. <br /> In addition, Petitioners request that the Board of Appeals also make a <br /> Declaratory Ruling declaring that the Planning Director enforce all other <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.