My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-01-19_Oath_of_Loyalty_
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Legal Opinions
>
2006-01-19_Oath_of_Loyalty_
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2011 4:37:42 PM
Creation date
7/15/2011 4:37:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Charlotte Masaki <br /> January 19, 2006 <br /> Page 2 <br /> "Officer" includes the following: <br /> (1) Mayor and members of the council. <br /> (2) Any person elected or appointed as administrative head of any <br /> agency of the County or appointed as a member or any board or <br /> commission provided for in this charter. <br /> (3) Any person appointed by a board or commission as the <br /> administrative head of any agency of the county. <br /> (4) Deputy, assistant or division chief appointed by the administrative <br /> head of any agency of the county. <br /> (5) Assistant or deputies of the corporation counsel and prosecuting <br /> attorney. <br /> Those persons who should execute oaths of office before entering upon the <br /> duties of their office shall subscribe to the oath of affirmation before some person duly <br /> qualified to administer oaths. This would include those persons described in the State <br /> Constitution as well as those persons described in the County Charter. <br /> Since the oath that is found in the County Charter is virtually the same as the <br /> oath prescribed in the State Constitution, it would be acceptable to utilize the oath found <br /> in the County Charter. The oath should be executed by those persons named as <br /> officers in the County Charter as well as those persons exercising police power who are <br /> required to execute an oath of office by the State Constitution. I would use one oath <br /> which can be modified by the individual department when the respective person <br /> executes the oath. <br /> There does not appear to be any requirement that the Department of Civil <br /> Service maintain the oaths or copies of the oaths or sign off on the oaths. This should <br /> be the responsibility of the department whose employees are required to execute the <br /> oath before entering upon their respective assignments. The responsible department <br /> should keep a copy of the oath which is sworn to by the employee. It may, however, be <br /> wise to keep a file of the oaths that are used by the various departments for their <br /> employees. I would recommend that the Police use only one oath. <br /> checked with my colleagues regarding those employees in their respective <br /> departments who exercise "police power." The listing is the same as that you supplied <br /> to me. I updated the research regarding the definition of police power, and it has not <br /> changed since the last opinion was rendered. If you have any additional questions <br /> please contact me at my office. <br /> MJU:mc <br /> s:work 2006\january\wrk 05-11362\ltr to civil svc re oath of loyalty <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.