My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-03 Council Member Term Limits Article III, Section 3-2, Hawaii County Charter
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Legal Opinions
>
2004-03 Council Member Term Limits Article III, Section 3-2, Hawaii County Charter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2011 4:42:10 PM
Creation date
7/15/2011 4:40:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Honorable Bob Jacobson <br /> May 26, 2004 <br /> Page 9 <br /> pamphlet in all circumstances (Citations omitted). However, in these <br /> circumstances, where the ballot pamphlet and the recent history of the <br /> term limits law reasonably led the voters to believe that the law was <br /> unchanged and where the fundamental right to hold public office is at <br /> issue, we conclude that the voters did not intend to change the term limits <br /> law so as to disqualify persons who had served two terms of office before <br /> July 1993. <br /> Woo, supra, 100 Cal.Rptr.2d at 162-164. <br /> As Woo instructs us, the holding of public office is a fundamental right that <br /> may only be curtailed if expressly provided by law. Where there is ambiguity, as <br /> in the 1996 Hawaii County Charter amendment, any ambiguity must be resolved <br /> in favor of allowing a potential candidate to run for elective office. <br /> State ex. rel. Voss v. Davis, 418 S.W.2d 163 (Missouri 1967), an old case <br /> found in our original research of this issue, and perhaps the only case which <br /> mildly supports the position that the 1996 Hawaii County Charter amendment <br /> has retroactive effect, is patently and easily distinguishable on its facts. <br /> In Davis, the Supreme Court of Missouri held, inter alia, that the <br /> constitutional authority and power to amend the Kansas City Charter carried with <br /> it the right of the people to determine the length of term of their elected officials, <br /> even though that incidentally would involve shortening the terms of incumbents. <br /> However, in Davis, and unlike the present situation involving the Hawaii County <br /> Charter, the Kansas City Charter amendments included the following language <br /> (recited in pertinent part): <br /> Sec. 489. Terms of office to be two years. The terms of office of all <br /> elective officials, including the mayor, the councilmen and the judges of <br /> the municipal court, shall be two years, and until their successors are <br /> elected and have qualified. <br /> The terms of office of officials elected at each biennial election after such <br /> 1965 election shall continue until ten o'clock in the forenoon of April 10th, <br /> two years after the date when they were elected and until their successors <br /> are elected and have qualified. This Section shall take effect immediately <br /> upon adoption. <br /> Sec. 490. Elections held every two years . . . (I)n the year 1967, and in <br /> f each second year thereafter, a regular municipal election for the choice of <br /> all such municipal officers to be elected by the people shall be held on the <br /> last Tuesday in March. A primary election shall be held in the city, in each <br /> election precinct thereof on the fourth Tuesday preceding each regular <br /> municipal election. All candidates for office shall be nominated and all <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.