My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-05 Further Clarification on the Attorney-Client Privilege
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Legal Opinions
>
2003-05 Further Clarification on the Attorney-Client Privilege
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2011 4:40:45 PM
Creation date
7/15/2011 4:40:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The concerned individual questioned the use of the word all with respect to e- <br /> mail communications in the above passage. <br /> So there is no confusion as to what e-mail communications are covered by the <br /> privilege, we wish to reaffirm that any e-mail related to our performance of <br /> professional legal work for our County clients is considered confidential. <br /> Although we believe our August 2003 advisory, when read comprehensively, <br /> provided clarity with respect to covered e-mail communications, we regret if it <br /> caused any confusion on the part of our clients. <br /> Again, if you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, we invite you <br /> to contact our office. <br /> Encl. <br /> Departments/Corp Counsel/Advisory 2003-5 10-23-03/LSAmr <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.