My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-08-14 Further Clarification of OIP Opinion Re Executive Meetings
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Legal Opinions
>
2003-08-14 Further Clarification of OIP Opinion Re Executive Meetings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2011 4:40:58 PM
Creation date
7/15/2011 4:40:47 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
We also stress the importance of adhering to the requirements of our Hawaii County Charter, <br /> with respect to open meetings. Article XIII, Section 13-20(b), of the Charter provides in <br /> pertinent part as follows: <br /> All meetings of the council, boards and commissions shall be held <br /> in the council meeting room or other public places and no such bodies <br /> shall take any official action except at a meeting open to the public. <br /> Where personal matters affecting the privacy of an individual are to <br /> be considered, the council, board or commission may, at the request <br /> of the individual involved, consider such matters in closed session; <br /> however, any official action resulting therefrom shall be acted upon <br /> in an open meeting. Boards and commissions that are empowered <br /> to give examinations to determine the capabilities of individuals shall <br /> be excepted from the provisions of this section when technical <br /> examinations and questionnaires are being drafted by such bodies. <br /> The earlier OIP opinion was written in response to a request from County Clerk Al Konishi and I <br /> regarding who may be present during executive meetings. As a practical matter, the Hawai'i <br /> County Council rarely goes into executive session, with the exception of discussing ongoing <br /> litigation cases with our attorneys. <br /> With respect to such attorney-client discussions, a closed meeting is permissible, based upon a <br /> 1977 order by former Third Circuit Court Administrative Judge Ernest Kubota, wherein the Court <br /> opined that the above-cited Charter provision allows discussions with counsel regarding <br /> pending or imminent litigation, or pending contested cases in administrative proceedings. See <br /> County Council v. David Shapiro, Civil No. 4684 (Third Circuit Court, Second Division, July 13, <br /> 1977). <br /> However, other boards and commissions may desire to hold executive meetings to discuss <br /> personnel matters, or other items where a significant privacy interest exists. In these situations, <br /> although the State Sunshine Law may permit such private meetings, our County Charter may <br /> not, absent the consent of the person whose privacy interest in impacted. In these situations, <br /> the specific consent of the person involved should be sought. <br /> Thank you for allowing our office to clarify these important issues with our County clients. <br /> If you have any questions regarding this matter, I invite you to contact me at 961-8304, <br /> extension 26, or via e-mail at lashida @co.hawaii.hi.us. <br /> Thank you. <br /> Encl. <br /> cc: Honorable Harry Kim, Mayor(w/encl.) <br /> All Department Heads (w/encl.) <br /> S: Departments/Corp Counsel/Memo 2003-4 7-31-03/LSAmr <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.