Laserfiche WebLink
Legislative Auditor County of Hawaii <br />OVERVIEW <br />Limited Scope Audit of the Department of Environmental Management's <br />Recycling and Diversion Grants Program, Fiscal Years 2004 and 2005 <br />Report No. 01 -06, June 2006 <br />This limited scope performance audit of the Department of Environmental Management, <br />Solid Waste Division, Recycling and Diversion Grant Programs for fiscal years 2004 and <br />2005, was initiated at the request of the Hawaii County Council in Resolution No. 168 -05. <br />This audit is intended to provide an objective assessment of the Department of <br />Environmental Management's compliance with applicable governmental regulations <br />related to its recycling and diversion programs; an objective assessment of its compliance <br />with applicable policies and statutory requirements in its procurement and contracting of <br />program services; an objective assessment of its implementation of and adherence to <br />standardized policies and procedures for managing and monitoring said programs; and <br />constructive recommendations for improvement of the Department's internal controls to <br />assist in more effective and efficient operation of the County's Recycling and Diversion <br />Programs. <br />Background <br />The Department of Environmental Management (DEM) was created by Charter <br />amendment in December 2000, and tasked with the enormous responsibility of <br />management, oversight, and operation of all solid waste and wastewater functions for <br />Hawaii County which were formerly under the purview of the Department of Public <br />Works. <br />The auditors would like to acknowledge that while audit findings indicate material <br />weaknesses in DEM's internal controls, the recycling and diversion programs represent <br />only one facet of the Department's responsibilities and accomplishments. When the <br />Department director was hired in 2002, she assumed responsibility for a department that <br />lacked several key management personnel, was facing a crisis forced by the imminent <br />closure of the East Hawaii Landfill, had no written recycling and diversion program <br />policies and procedures, and was statutorily mandated to meet certain recycling and <br />diversion goals with inadequate and degraded infrastructure. <br />