My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-01-AU Audit of the County of Hawai‘i's Recycling and Diversion Grants Program
PublicDocuments
>
Legislative Auditor
>
Audit Reports
>
County Auditor Reports
>
2006-01-AU Audit of the County of Hawai‘i's Recycling and Diversion Grants Program
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2011 3:42:14 PM
Creation date
7/19/2011 12:27:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER 2 GENERAL FINDINGS <br />Accurate evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of current solid waste management systems <br />and special programs cannot presently be accomplished due to lack of verifiable data related to: <br />• Outsourced Diversion and Recycling Programs <br />o Poorly formulated vendor requirements and procedures and inadequate control measures <br />do not ensure the accuracy of data collected or permit the corroboration of quantities and <br />weights claimed as diverted. <br />Transfer Stations <br />• While the Updated ISWMP states that at least 42 percent of the County's solid waste <br />disposed of at landfills is collected at transfer stations, the County has not designated the <br />upgrading of transfer stations as a high budget priority. The County needs to demonstrate <br />its commitment by implementing a viable solution for segregation, reduction, diversion, <br />and recycling of the County's waste stream. <br />• Banned and recyclable wastes continue to be disposed of in collection trailers, and <br />subsequently transferred to landfills due to: <br />■ Inadequate or non - existent receptacles to collect recyclables and segregate hazardous <br />or banned wastes, exposing the entire waste stream to contamination with hazardous <br />materials. <br />■ No monitoring of wastes disposed. <br />■ No sorting of wastes presented in plastic bags. <br />■ No regular staffing or security at transfer sites. <br />Recommendations <br />1. We recommend that the Mayor and County Council, in consultation with DEM, revise and <br />adhere to the Updated ISWMP as the long -term plan for addressing the County's solid <br />waste streams. <br />• There needs to be a County -wide commitment for implementation of and adherence to a long- <br />term solid waste management plan on the part of all stakeholders, including the Mayor, DEM, <br />County Council, and the recycling public, regardless of changes in elected officials. <br />o The County should consider codifying the "agreed" upon long -term solid waste <br />management plan. <br />If the Updated ISWMP is to represent the County's strategic plan for solid waste <br />management, it needs to be further updated and revised to address at a minimum: <br />• The priority, in quantifiable measures, of recycling and diversion in the County's solid <br />waste management system. <br />• Specific goals pertaining to solid waste reduction, recycling, and diversion, and specific <br />timelines for attaining said goals. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.