Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTER 2 GENERAL FINDINGS <br />Subsequent Events <br />In a letter to the audit team dated May 24, 2006, Aaron Fujioka, Administrator of the State <br />Procurement Office, stated: <br />"This is in response to your May 19, 2006 request pertaining to applicability of <br />HRS Chapter 103D, the procurement code regarding grants'. The procurement <br />code provides exemptions for `grants' as follows: <br />§103D -102 (b) (2) (A) <br />For grants or subsidies, as defined in HRS Chapter 42F made by the state, or <br />by the counties pursuant to their respective charters or ordinances; or <br />§103D- 102(b)(2)(I) <br />Pursuant to HRS Chapter 103F, for contracts to provide health and human <br />services. Act 169, SLH 2005 amended section 103F -101, to, allow the counties <br />to utilize Chapter 103F to purchase health and human services. <br />We view appropriated funds, which do not specify a named recipient or provider, <br />to be subject to compliance with the procurement code, unless addressed by county <br />charter or ordinance. " <br />If this State Procurement Office's interpretation is, in fact, correct, the impact on the County could be <br />significant. Therefore, we reiterate the importance of obtaining a legal determination and clarification <br />of the following issues: <br />• Does the County have authority to grant funds to both non -profit and for - profit entities? <br />• Does County Code chapter 2, article 25 provide that the only "grants" permitted to be <br />awarded by any branch of the County are the $900,000 in annual grants awarded by the <br />Council directly to specific non - profit entities? <br />• When is a grant appropriate, what are the grant criteria, and how and by whom must a grant <br />be approved? <br />• Does adoption of a departmental budget by ordinance give the department authority to grant <br />funds? if so, is the procurement exempt from State and County procurement codes? <br />18 <br />