Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 3 ADF — GLASS CONTAINER RECOVERY PROGRAM <br />Contract File Documentation <br />Table 1.1 <br />ADF <br />Atlas Recycling <br />Contract Activity Summary <br />Fiscal Years 2003 -2004 and 2004 -2005 <br />Contract <br />Contract <br />Contract Contract Contracted Maximum <br />Number Date Period Ratellb. Dollars <br />Fiscal Year 2003 -2004 <br />Jul - Dec <br />4063 9/2312003 '03 <br />Jan — <br />4120 2/19/2004 Jun'04 <br />Total 2003 -2004 <br />Fiscal Year 2004 -2005 <br />Jul - Dec <br />000140 9114/2004 '04 <br />Jan — <br />000318 4/22/2005 Jun '05 <br />Total 2004 -2005 <br />Contract Lbs. lbs. <br />Maximum Reported lbs. Carried Dollars <br />Pounds Sold Paid Over Paid <br />14,140 $ 72,750 <br />1011b. $72,750 727,500 706,280 727,500 <br />71,340 $ 73,750 <br />1011b, 73,750 737,500 794,700 737,500 <br />1,465,000 1,500,980 1,465,000 85,480 $146,500 <br />$146,500 <br />$ 73,250 <br />.0811b. 73,250 915625 915140 915625 70855 <br />$ 32,481 <br />.0611b. 73,250 915625 ' 335160 406015 0 <br />1,831,250 1,250r300 1,321,640 70,855 $105,731 <br />$146,500 <br />DEM advised that Contract No. 000318 was subsequently reduced to $53,250, Ora maximum of 665,625 pounds, although no documentation for <br />the reduction was found in DEM program files. However, since the contractor processed less than 665,625 pounds, the reduction does not <br />create an issue relating to pounds processed or payments made. <br />Note - Difference between pounds reported sold and pounds paid, represents adjustments made for prior period carryovers, maximum processing <br />limitations and mathematical errors. <br />Auditors reviewed a sampling of receipts for buy -back incentives paid during the audit period. Atlas <br />pays a buy -back incentive of two cents per pound for loads exceeding 200 pounds, and therefore, <br />appears to be in compliance with statutory buy -back incentive requirements. <br />All glass processed by Atlas during the audit period was sold to a private ranch in West Hawaii for <br />use as roadway base course. DEM requires that the contractor weigh all loads of glass at a certified <br />weight scale prior to delivery, and that weight tickets, buyer verifications, and photographs <br />accompany requests for payment. DEM reviews scale tickets for accuracy using a standard tare <br />weight for each vehicle, and reconciles the total of all scale tickets with contractor invoices and end - <br />user verifications. This process appears to have been consistently followed during the audit period. <br />However, additional controls for verification of end -user deliveries should be considered to reduce <br />the risk of stockpiling and reweighing processed glass. Currently, the County requires submission of <br />photographs of processed glass deposited at an end -user site, but such photographs do not constitute <br />adequate control since the end -user normally accepts multiple loads making identification of specific <br />loads difficult. <br />When auditors inquired about the contractual requirement for development of programs to promote <br />public participation and education, Ms. Allen indicated that while Atlas does not have flyers, <br />30 <br />