My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-01-AU Audit of the County of Hawai‘i's Recycling and Diversion Grants Program
PublicDocuments
>
Legislative Auditor
>
Audit Reports
>
County Auditor Reports
>
2006-01-AU Audit of the County of Hawai‘i's Recycling and Diversion Grants Program
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2011 3:42:14 PM
Creation date
7/19/2011 12:27:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 3 ADF — GLASS CONTAINER RECOVERY PROGRAM <br />With the implementation of the H15 program in October 2004, disparity was created between the <br />processing rates paid to contractors for ADF glass and H15 glass. If ADF container weights were <br />processed as HI5 weights, the processor would be paid approximately 19.2 cents per pound versus the <br />eight cents per pound paid under the ADF program. This is based on a calculation of 2.4 containers <br />per pound multiplied by the five cent per container deposit refund, plus the 3 cent per container <br />handling fee. In an attempt to resolve this disparity, DEM increased the per pound handling fee for <br />ADF glass to 20 cents per pound for the period of January to June 2006. <br />Whether the County will be able to continue to underwrite this disparity or continue the ADF <br />program is unclear. Although the State Environmental Management Special Fund is intended to <br />finance county glass recovery programs, the Governor appropriated $2,000,000 of the fiscal year <br />2003 -2004 special fund surplus to the General Fund. The result of this appropriation is a severe <br />reduction in ADF program funding with an allocation to Hawaii County of only about $16,650 for <br />fiscal year 2006 -2007. Recycling Coordinator O'Hora -Weir advised that DOH communicated in July <br />2004 that the County's allocation for fiscal year 2006 -2007 would be approximately $149,000. <br />However, DOH revised that figure to $63,500 in January 2006, and further reduced the allocation to <br />$16,650 in March 2006. The explanation given was that ADF revenue for calendar year 2005 was <br />only $683,630 compared with $3,381,455 in fiscal year 2003 -2004 and $1,500,015 in fiscal year <br />2004 -2005 due to increased use of plastic containers for products traditionally packaged in glass <br />(such as mayonnaise and alcohol). However, since calendar and fiscal years are not comprised of the <br />same twelve -month periods, the accuracy and logic of the State's comparison are questionable. The <br />$298,000 allocated to the County in fiscal year 2004 -2005 represents 8.81 percent of the $3,381,455 <br />in ADF revenues reported for fiscal year 2003 -2004, and the $298,000 allocated to the County in <br />fiscal year 2005 -2006 represents 19.86 percent of the $1,500,015 in ADF revenues reported for fiscal <br />year 2004 -2005. Even when calculating 8.81 percent of the $683,630 in State revenues for calendar <br />year 2005, the County's allocation for fiscal year 2006 -2007 would presumably be approximately <br />$60,228, well above the $16,650 allocated to Hawaii County. <br />Auditors requested from DOH a historical accounting of its ADF account and the Environmental <br />Management Special Fund. DOH responded that it did not have the information available, but would <br />attempt to procure it. However, to date, auditors have not received the information. Auditors also <br />contacted DOH Solid Waste Planner Lane Otsu to request statistical data on the percentage of ADF <br />glass that should have shifted to the County's HI5 program. Mr. Otsu said the data is not tracked by <br />County, and that the DOH is still trying to get a "handle" on what the statewide percentage should be. <br />According to Recycling Coordinator O'Hora -Weir, Mr. Otsu indicated that 65 percent of ADF glass <br />was expected to shift to the County's HI5 program. Analysis of the change in ADF claims for the first <br />six months of the HI5 program appear to be in line with this percentage, with BSH showing a 58 <br />percent decrease and Atlas showing a 65 percent decrease in ADF tonnage reported for the period <br />January to June 2005 compared with the same period in 2004. <br />If State funding for the ADF program is drastically reduced to the aforementioned levels, the County <br />is left with two options: 1) fund the deficiency and continue the program on its own, or 2) severely <br />limit or discontinue the program. If the second option is implemented, glass recycling operators will <br />be given further incentive to include ADF glass in their HI5 weight claims. <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.