Laserfiche WebLink
CONTENTS <br />INTRODUCTION......................................................................... ............................... 1 <br />SUMMARY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................... ............................... 3 <br />SECTION 1: KEY PROVISIONS AND BUDGETARY OVERVIEW OF THE HAWAII <br />COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT SUBSIDIZED VEHICLE PROGRAM <br />A. Key Provisions of the HCPD Subsidized Vehicle Program ...... ............................... 6 <br />B. Current Vehicle Allowance Costs ...................................... ............................... 8 <br />C. Insurance Costs ........................................................ ............................... 8 <br />D. Five -Year Budget Summary ............................................ ............................... 9 <br />SECTION 2: AUDITOR'S OFFICE INQUIRY TO CORPORATION COUNSEL <br />RE: SHOPO CONTRACT <br />A. Auditor's Office Inquiry Re: SHOPO Contract ................... ............................... 10 <br />B. Corporation Counsel Guidance dated August 26, 2003 ........... ............................... 11 <br />SECTION 3: REVIEW OF HAWAII COUNTY'S PAST STUDIES ON SUBSIDIZED <br />SECTION 4: POLICE VISIBILITY AND MARKED POLICE PATROL FLEETS —A REVIEW <br />A. An Examination of the Effectiveness of Traditional Police Patrol .............................. 38 <br />1. National Institute of Justice Findings .......................... ............................... 39 <br />2. The Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment ............... ............................... 40 <br />i <br />vs. FLEET SYSTEMS <br />A. <br />Police Cars in Hawaii and Guam ....................................... ............................... <br />13 <br />B. <br />"A Study of the Automobile Allowance System of the Hawaii County Police <br />Department," 1972 ...................................................... ............................... <br />14 <br />C. <br />Hawaii County Police Department "Pilot Police Fleet Study," 1978 ............................ <br />18 <br />D. <br />Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. Review of the Puna Fleet Study, 1979 ............................ <br />21 <br />E. <br />"Police Automobile Fleet Study for the Hawaii Police Department," 1994 .................... <br />22 <br />1. Maui Police Department Fleet Program Findings .............. ............................... <br />22 <br />F. <br />Maui Police Department "Subsidized Automobile Study," 2002 .. ............................... <br />28 <br />G. <br />"The Price of Visibility," West Hawaii Crime Stoppers, Inc., 2003 ............................... <br />29 <br />H. <br />Hawaii Police Department Fleet vs. Subsidized Vehicle Report, 2003 .......................... <br />30 <br />I. <br />Hawaii Police Department Fleet vs. Subsidized Vehicle Report II, 2003 ....................... <br />32 <br />J. <br />Summary ................................................................. ............................... <br />35 <br />SECTION 4: POLICE VISIBILITY AND MARKED POLICE PATROL FLEETS —A REVIEW <br />A. An Examination of the Effectiveness of Traditional Police Patrol .............................. 38 <br />1. National Institute of Justice Findings .......................... ............................... 39 <br />2. The Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment ............... ............................... 40 <br />i <br />