My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-01-AU Hawai‘i County Police Department Vehicles
PublicDocuments
>
Legislative Auditor
>
Audit Reports
>
County Auditor Reports
>
2004-01-AU Hawai‘i County Police Department Vehicles
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2011 2:13:19 PM
Creation date
7/19/2011 2:02:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that gasoline and oil consumption was 20% higher for private vehicles than the county -owned fl eet during <br />the study period." <br />Sl gni f cant operati onal data gathered duri ng the study exami ned vehi d e avai I abi I i ty /downti me, as wel I as <br />crime statistics/traffic accidents in the Puna district and citizen reaction to the county -owned marked <br />pol i ce cars. <br />Duri ng the one -year Puna experi ment, " vehi cl a avai I abi I i ty" was defi ned as " the toted number of vehi d es <br />avai I abl a for use on any gi ven shi ft." Duri ng the proj ect, there was a toted of 1,071 shi fts (357 days x 3 <br />shi fts = 1, 071). Duri ng the proj ect peri od, the total number of vehi d e shi fts total ed 7,497 (357 days x 3 <br />shi ftsx 7 cars= 7,497). For 38 of the 1,071 shifts, the number of personnel assigned to duty exceeded the <br />number of avai I abl a vehi cl es, requi ri ng off cers to be sent home on compensatory ti me off. On 42 shi fts, <br />the vehicles available equaled the number of officers assigned, with no spare vehicles available for <br />emergenci es. <br />" Downti me," representi ng the peri od of ti me a vehi d e i s out of servi ce, total ed 918 shi fts duri ng the pi I of <br />proj ect. Routi ne servi ci ng and mall ntenance accounted for downti me of 357 vehi cl a shi fts; motor vehi d e <br />accidents accounted the remaining downtime of 561 vehicle shifts. The study attributed extended <br />downtime for vehicles involved in accidents to "the availability of parts for repairs." One car that <br />sustai ned ml or trunk, ri ght tai I I i ght and rear bumper damage remai ned i noperati ve for 64 days. <br />Duri ng the pi I of proj ect (A ugust, 1976 —Jul y, 1977) , the total number of cri mes commi tted i n the Puna <br />Di stri ct i ncreased by 8.9% over the precedi ng 12 -month peri od. Traffi c acci dents i ncreased 16% duri ng <br />the same peri od. The study cond uded: " Despi to stati sti cs showi ng an i ncrease i n cri mes and traffi c <br />acci dents, there i s no supporti ve data to concl ude that the county -owned marked vehi d es had a negati ve <br />or posi ti ve effect on cri mi nal acti vi ty and traffi c acci dents." <br />The study stated that an " i nformal pol I" reveal ed favorabl e ci ti zen reacti on to the presence of county - <br />owned marked vehicles, due to their "high visibility" and "resulting feeling security." Citizens also <br />expressed concern over the absence of marked vehicles that they related to an absence of police <br />protecti on. <br />Commenti ng on thi s ci ti zen reacti on, a fol I ow -up audi t by Peat, M arwi dc, M i tchel I & Company observed <br />that " thi s I after statement woul d appear to be true for a f I eet of unmarked, pri vatel y owned vehi cl es as <br />wel L" The H CPD study stated that " these si tuati ons occur pri maxi I y as a resul t of heavy case I oads and <br />mi ni mum watch strengths whi ch di rectl y affect the amount of general patrol." <br />Cost and operati onal data gathered from the R I of Fl eet Study were subsequentl y compared to " what <br />woul d have been expended to operate f fteen (15) pri vatel y -owned subsi di zed vehi d es duri ng the same <br />peri od as the pi I of fl eet." At the ti me, monthl y al I owances for pri vale cars were $195 /month for Group I <br />Officers and $165 /month for Group I I Officers. As it does now, the County then furnished gasoline for <br />subsi di zed cars at the rate of one gal I on per ten mi I es of off i ci al duty travel; one quart of of I for every 500 <br />off i ci al mi I es; and publ i c I i abi I i ty and publ i c property damage i nsurance. <br />For these costs (car al I owance, $34,380; i nsurance, $2,025; gas & of 1, $21,417), the total cost of <br />mai ntal ni ng a subsi di zed f I eet of 15 cars was $57,822, as compared to the pi I of f I eet cost of $60,173 <br />($61,852.88 mi nus the $1,680 cost of safety shi el ds). <br />The tabl e shown bet ow summari zes the comparabl a cost i tems of a 7 -vehi d e county fl eet vs. a 15 vehi d e <br />subsi di zed pri vale f I eet. <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.