|
I n devel opi ng i is cost esti mate, the 1994 study authors i ncorporated several assumpti ons, as fol I ows:
<br />• The study revi eNed actual mileage recorded by patrol officers and determined that an annual
<br />average of 34,343 mi I es i s obtai ned, thus patrol vehi cl es woul d reach a 100, 000 mi I e warranty
<br />I i mi t i n 2.9 years.
<br />• For non - patrol vehi cl es, a three -year /50,000 warranty was deemed suffi ci ent.
<br />• The most reasonabl a opti on for handl i ng repai r and mai ntenance was seen to be repai r shops i n
<br />Hilo and Kona, respectively.
<br />• Routi ne servi ci ng of f I eet vehi d es — of I changes, of I f i I ter changes, undercarri age I ubri cati on,
<br />checks of vari ous fl ui ds, etc. — were recommended to be performed every 3,000 mi I es.
<br />• A f I eet coordi nator posi ti on at an SR -16 sal ary rati ng was requi red; sal ary and f ri nge benef i is for
<br />thi s posi ti on were esti mated to range as hi gh as $50,215 per year.
<br />Based on the vehi d e bi ds and assumpti ons above, the 1994 study then developed an annual esti mate of
<br />fl eet costs as shown bel ow:
<br />The 1994 report then compared its estimated annual fleet cost, excluding gas, oil and repairs
<br />($1,573,380), to its annual subsidized vehicle expenditures (also excluding gas, oil and repairs) of
<br />$2,094,425 and proj ected that a fl eet program woul d yi el d an annual savi ngs to the County of $521,045.
<br />27
<br />FLEET PROJECTION COSTS (1994 HPD STUDY)
<br />PATROL
<br />4WD
<br />UNMARKED
<br />TOTAL
<br />Cost Per Vehicle
<br />$18,917
<br />$20,141
<br />$11,682
<br />Proration
<br />3 years
<br />3 years
<br />3 years
<br />Period /Mileage
<br />100,000
<br />100,000
<br />50,000
<br />Resale Value
<br />Per Vehicle
<br />$291
<br />$4,000
<br />$3,000
<br />Vehicles Needed
<br />103
<br />43
<br />66
<br />212
<br />Total Cost of Vehicles
<br />$1,948,451
<br />$866,063
<br />$771,012
<br />$3,585,526
<br />Annual Prorated
<br />Cost of Vehicles
<br />$649,483
<br />$288,687
<br />$257,004
<br />$1,195,174
<br />Less Prorated
<br />Resale Value
<br />$9,991
<br />$57,333
<br />$66,000
<br />$ 133,324
<br />- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
<br />Adjusted Annual Costs
<br />- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
<br />$639,492
<br />- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
<br />$231,354
<br />- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
<br />$191,004
<br />- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
<br />$1,061,850
<br />Plus Maintenance
<br />& Servicing
<br />$ 252,379
<br />Plus Collision/Vehicle
<br />Damage
<br />$ 138,376
<br />Plus Miscellaneous
<br />Auto Parts /Supplies
<br />$ 70,560
<br />Plus Fleet Coordinator's
<br />Salary & Fringe
<br />$ 50,215
<br />Projected Annual Fleet Costs
<br />$1,573,380
<br />The 1994 report then compared its estimated annual fleet cost, excluding gas, oil and repairs
<br />($1,573,380), to its annual subsidized vehicle expenditures (also excluding gas, oil and repairs) of
<br />$2,094,425 and proj ected that a fl eet program woul d yi el d an annual savi ngs to the County of $521,045.
<br />27
<br />
|