My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-02-AU Limited Scope Performance Audit of the Highway Fund
PublicDocuments
>
Legislative Auditor
>
Audit Reports
>
County Auditor Reports
>
2009-02-AU Limited Scope Performance Audit of the Highway Fund
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2011 2:48:36 PM
Creation date
7/19/2011 2:40:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 4: CHALLENGES FACING THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS <br />the life of pavement may save up to four dollars in future <br />rehabilitation costs, points to the cost benefit of implementing a <br />preventative road maintenance program. <br />[Source: NCHRP Synthesis 223: Cost - Effective Preventative Pavement <br />Maintenance. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, <br />Washington, DC, 1996, p.2.] <br />FINDING: 'Roads in limbo' refers to roads that were laid out by the <br />government, but are not part of the State road system and are not <br />Maintenance of currently maintained by the County government. As of February <br />CountCount roads -in- 2009, the County's website Roads in Limbo Fact Sheet states: <br />y "[T]here are 408.9 miles of Roads in Limbo located island wide. Of <br />limbo still in that, 122.6 miles exist and are recognized as government or <br />homestead roads. There are also 286.3 miles of paper roads; rights <br />limbo. of way that are shown on tax maps, but have not yet been built. <br />The County has now accepted responsibility for maintaining 122.6 <br />miles of existing Roads in Limbo." The State's Deputy Attorney <br />General in 1963, Op. 63 -54, referred to a real property parcel <br />reserved for a road that had never been opened, laid out, or built as <br />a "paper" road. <br />When the auditors requested documentation of the policy and <br />criteria used to accept 122.6 miles out of the 408.9 miles of <br />disputed roads -in- limbo, a DPW Division Chief responded, "I don't <br />know. Corporation Counsel, myself and others are supposed to <br />come up with some sort of policy." Without a policy and criteria for <br />determining if a road had been opened, laid out, or built, the <br />question is raised as to how the County determined that 122.6 miles <br />exist and the rest of the roads are "paper" roads. <br />The State has established that along with other duties, the County <br />has the duty to maintain and repair all county highways: <br />Section 265A -1, HRS, provides as follows: "County <br />authority. The several councils or other governing bodies <br />of the several political subdivisions of the State shall have <br />the general supervision, charge, and control of, and the <br />duty to maintain and repair, all county highways, bikeways, <br />and sidewalks and shall have the power to determine the <br />terms under which irrigation or drainage ditches, flumes, <br />railroads, including plantation railroads and similar <br />structures, telephone, electric light and power lines and <br />pipes and other conduits may be maintained upon, under, <br />over, and across the same, and the councils or other <br />governing bodies may make all regulations needful for the <br />public convenience and safety in all cases where <br />permission has been or may be granted to maintain the <br />ditches, railroads, pipes, or other structures across, under, <br />over, and upon all county highways. All other law to the <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.