My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-02-AU Limited Scope Performance Audit of the Highway Fund
PublicDocuments
>
Legislative Auditor
>
Audit Reports
>
County Auditor Reports
>
2009-02-AU Limited Scope Performance Audit of the Highway Fund
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2011 2:48:36 PM
Creation date
7/19/2011 2:40:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 4: CHALLENGES FACING THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS <br />by the County to a developer. Hawai'i County Real Property Tax <br />Office records show that the Department of Finance sold a parcel <br />consisting of two lots totaling 660.8 acres (Tax Map Key No. 4 -8 -3- <br />5) abutting Mud Lane for $1,600,000 (about $2,421 /acre) on March <br />16, 2005. Prior to the sale, the Planning Director wrote a letter <br />dated July 8, 2004 and copied to the Director of Finance, <br />responding to questions from a prospective purchaser. The letter <br />stated: "I have consulted with the Department of Public Works and <br />we would be comfortable with re- graveling of the poorer areas of <br />the existing Mud Lane, and a gravel road approximately 18' wide to <br />the property boundary on the portion that currently exists only as a <br />trail on the ground (approximately .5 miles). We would require <br />covenants in the deeds that the purchasers understand that Mud <br />Lane has not been regularly maintained by the county, and that <br />they do not expect regular maintenance, and that lot owners would <br />maintain the last .5 miles (although it could not be closed to the <br />public.)" <br />"An official with the County Department of Finance said at the time <br />that the price was so low because the land was sold 'as is', with <br />poor access. At the time the County initially listed the property at <br />$4.9 million, sold to Waimea 660 for less than a third of that. <br />Waimea 660 currently has it on the market for $6.9 million. When <br />Waimea 660 made its purchase, Mud Lane was in bad shape. It <br />was designated a substandard 'road in limbo' over which the county <br />claimed it had no jurisdiction..." Additionally, approximately 1.8 <br />miles of Mud Lane were paved by the County shortly after the sale <br />of the property. <br />[Source: Krista Sherer, Waipio Expressway? The fight over Mud Lane, Hawaii <br />Island Journal, December 8 -14, 2007] <br />The determination of which roads are accepted for maintenance <br />and repair appears to be inconsistent. Again, the foregoing letter <br />regarding Mud Lane from the Planning Director stated: "I have <br />consulted with the Department of Public Works and we would be <br />comfortable with re- graveling of the poorer areas of the existing <br />Mud Lane, and a gravel road approximately 18' wide to the property <br />boundary on the portion that currently exists only as a trail on the <br />ground (approximately .5 miles)." However, a letter from the Office <br />of the Corporation Counsel dated July 26, 2007, regarding County <br />Ownership of Homestead Road, North Kona, Hawaii, stated: "Our <br />County surveyors generally agree with this historical background. <br />However, we understand that there is no actual homestead road <br />constructed, but only a rough trail that traverses the general area. <br />Hence, we must regard this not as an actual road for highway use, <br />but no more than a 'paper' road, not in actual existence." <br />Given that historical roads used to access properties by horse - <br />drawn vehicles, early automobiles, and plantation trucks were not <br />built to current County standards, it is important that the County <br />have a plan, policy, and procedure with standardized and objective <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.