Laserfiche WebLink
Executive Summary <br />The primary goals of construction contract management are to ensure that capital improvement <br />projects are delivered efficiently, effectively, equitably and with accountability. This is <br />accomplished through communication and implementation of and adherence to clearly defined <br />internal controls. As outlined in the FY 2007 -2008 CIP budget, the County of Hawaii proposed <br />approximately $748,675,000 in capital improvement projects to repair, improve and construct <br />County -owned facilities over the next six years. Of this six -year CIP projection, $323,669,000 is <br />estimated for completion of Department of Public Works projects. Professional services <br />contracts and construction contracts will account for most of these DPW expenditures, with <br />contract supplements and change orders representing a significant portion thereof if current <br />trends continue. <br />While contract supplements and change orders are routine components of construction <br />management and cannot be completely avoided, the accepted industry average is between + or - <br />10% of original contract values. Of the 16 professional services contracts active during the FY <br />2006 -2007 audit period, contract supplements issued to date represent a 90% increase over <br />original contract amounts. Of the 60 construction contracts active during the FY 2006 -2007 audit <br />period, change orders issued to date range from -6% to +114% of original contract amounts. Of <br />the 14 professional services contracts and 14 construction contracts meeting our audit sample <br />criteria of greater than + or — 10% of original contract values (or outside the accepted industry <br />average), 64% remain open and exceed their original contractual completion dates and 50% <br />remain open and exceed their current contractual completion dates. <br />The Legislative Auditor initiated this limited scope performance audit to evaluate the <br />Department of Public Works' practices, policies and procedures for minimizing the need for and <br />controlling the timing and cost of professional services contract supplements and construction <br />contract change orders. While we did not find contract supplements or change orders issued for <br />unnecessary work, departmental policies and procedures and internal controls were found to be <br />inadequate resulting in contract supplements and change orders arising from avoidable or <br />foreseeable circumstances such as insufficient identification of user needs prior to project design <br />and construction (scoping), inadequate site assessment, errors or omissions in design plans and <br />specifications, and under- or over - estimation of project costs by professional services <br />consultants, construction contractors and /or County engineers. We also noted instances of <br />contract supplements and change orders issued for work outside the scope of original contracts. <br />While in certain instances, a cost savings may have been realized by the County when a <br />contractor already in the project area did not charge mobilization costs for additional work, <br />contract supplements and change orders need to be examined in light of their compliance with <br />procurement law and fair competition and impact on public perception and confidence. It is also <br />imperative that DPW develop, implement and adhere to sufficient internal control policies and <br />procedures to provide reasonable assurance that the possibility of undetected abuse relating to <br />supplements and change orders is kept to an acceptable level. <br />While the Department of Public Works' practices, policies, and procedures for monitoring and <br />control of contract supplements and change orders were the focus of this limited scope <br />performance audit, the Legislative Auditor also determined that several extra - departmental and <br />