My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-05-04 Windward Transcript HU HONUA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2011
>
2011-05-04 Windward Transcript HU HONUA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2011 3:10:37 PM
Creation date
7/21/2011 3:10:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
On August 12, 2010, there was a motion made to deny granting standing in a contested case to Claudia <br />Rohr which was approved five to zero. <br /> <br />And, lastly, on April 7, 2011, there were, there was a motion made to not allow oral arguments by Mr. <br />Strauss, approved by voice vote four to zero, none opposed. <br /> <br />Lastly, there was a motion made to continue the hearing until May 4, and May 5, 2011, which was <br />approved four to zero. <br /> <br />DOMINGO: Okay, -. <br /> <br />KERN: Commissioner Domingo, give me one moment. So now we’ve heard the motions that were <br />made, how that has gone down. We can either vote for it to ratify all at once; or if there is a particular <br />issue with one of those motions the Commissioner has, you can vote no on that and -. <br /> <br />DOMINGO: Could I ask for a minute recess, Mr. Chairman, one minute? <br /> <br />KERN: Yeah, one minute recess. Thank you. <br /> <br />RECESSED – The Chair called for a short recess at 11:48 a.m. <br /> <br />RECONVENED – The Chair reconvened the meeting at 11:49 a.m. <br /> <br />KERN: Okay. I just want to make sure that the Commissioners that are here that are voting, I know <br />myself I am knowledgeable of all the stuff, that you have knowledge of these actions that we’re taking, <br />that were taken and that, you know, you’ve reviewed the record, and your understanding of what it is <br />we are potentially ratifying here. And so, again, we have a potential to ratify all of the said motions and <br />decisions at one time or we, if there’s a Commissioner that has any particular opposition with one of <br />those, you know, you can vote against it; and we can take that one up individually. So with that, <br />anyone willing to entertain a motion? Basically the motion needs to sound something like, you know, <br />willing to ratify the past decisions that the, or the past votes taken on the SMA application, something <br />in those types of words. <br /> <br />DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman? <br />KERN: Commissioner Domingo. <br /> <br />DOMINGO: Just for the point of clarification, those ratifications are asked for because Commissioner <br />Ishibashi was a part of those proceedings and that is why there is a need to ratify actions of the <br />meetings? <br /> <br />KERN: Yes. And with that I'm going to let our Corporation Counsel speak to that. <br /> <br />MECKLENBURG: Yeah, again, as I said, I believe that due to the Rule of Necessity where there were <br />four Commissioners present and we would have lost quorum had we not acted, it is probably not <br />necessary. But to be very cautious with this matter and to move ahead, the idea is for the <br />5 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.