My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-01-AU Limited Scope Performance Audit of the Department of Parks and Recreation’s Facilities Asset Management
PublicDocuments
>
Legislative Auditor
>
Audit Reports
>
County Auditor Reports
>
2011-01-AU Limited Scope Performance Audit of the Department of Parks and Recreation’s Facilities Asset Management
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2011 10:32:18 AM
Creation date
7/22/2011 10:13:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 3: OPERATIONS <br /> particular issue that has been prioritized prior to the process and <br /> has already made it onto the CIP consideration list." <br /> If the Work Order Process requires that certain repair requests be transferred from the Parks <br /> Maintenance Division to the Park Planning Division based on estimated repair costs, complexity <br /> of repair, or lack of in-house expertise, then monitoring controls need to be implemented to <br /> ensure that the work order will be prioritized and completed within the current CIP Budget, or <br /> prioritized and submitted for completion in the next fiscal year's CIP Budget. Having a common <br /> database for all necessary maintenance and repair requests — whether periodic or preventative <br /> maintenance, emergency repair, or major rehabilitation — would facilitate prioritization, ranking, <br /> planning, budgeting, scheduling, monitoring, and reporting of work orders. <br /> As recommended in the State of Idaho's "Best Practices Maintenance Plan for School Buildings" <br /> (September 2006): "Involve appropriate maintenance personnel in decision marking and <br /> in communicating buildings' needs." The Parks Maintenance Division advises that it <br /> communicates with the P&R Administration and Park Planning Division during the annual <br /> departmental budget process. However, the number of documented, but uncorrected critical <br /> repair issues indicates a breakdown in the ability of existing processes and systems to ensure <br /> timely identification, communication, prioritization, budgeting, and correction of critical <br /> maintenance and repair issues. <br /> Another example of the breakdown or disconnect in P&R's current systems regarding repair and <br /> maintenance is found when reviewing the Quarterly and Annual Recreational Facility Reports <br /> completed by the Recreation Division's facility and program staff. In their quarterly and annual <br /> reports, Recreation Division personnel submit information regarding needed maintenance and <br /> repair at their respective facilities and any negative impacts of facility conditions on their ability <br /> to provide programs and services to their respective communities. The Quarterly and Annual <br /> Recreational Facility Reports are routed to P&R administrators, but are not integrated into <br /> corrective work or remediation plans or into the Department's Operating or CIP Budgets. A <br /> review of Quarterly and Annual Recreational Facility Reports dating back several years indicate <br /> that although consistently reported, critical repair problems at certain facilities — such as termite <br /> infestation and leaking roofs — continue to go unaddressed. It should also be noted that <br /> although these deficiencies still exist, the Department's proposed Operating Budget for FY2011- <br /> 2012 includes zero dollars in the "fumigation" and "roof and gutters" categories for <br /> Miscellaneous Contract Services. <br /> P&R DEPARTMENT LACKS ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN TO <br /> GUIDE PARKS MAINTENANCE DIVISION <br /> Lack of an asset management plan makes it difficult for the Parks Maintenance Division to carry <br /> out its daily, monthly, semi-annual, and annual maintenance and repair duties. In an email <br /> response dated April 7, 2011 to our request for documentation of the Department's asset <br /> management policies, the Department stated that it does not have a comprehensive policies <br /> manual or similar document that establishes a formal asset management policy. The email <br /> goes on to explain that the Department and its Divisions determine their individual and collective <br /> asset management policies through informal processes involving the P&R Administration, its <br /> Division and Section Heads, employee feedback, the Mayor's Office, the County Council, public <br /> input, and other sources. The fact that the Department has not expended all of its maintenance <br /> and repair funds appropriated and allocated over several fiscal years, when critical repair issues <br /> have been documented, indicates that its current planning and budgeting processes are not <br /> adequate to support its needs in managing facilities. The Department's current planning and <br /> 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.