Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Chief Oliveira replied in the affirmative. <br /> <br />Deputy Corporation Counsel Brilhante noted for the record that Chief Oliveira was <br />provided a copy of the draft transmittal of his evaluation to the Mayor for his <br />review. <br /> <br />Commissioner Henkel moved to discuss the draft transmittal of the Fire <br />Commission’s 2010 evaluation of Chief Oliveira. The motion was seconded by <br />Commissioner Stabo and unanimously carried by voice vote. <br /> <br />Commissioner Namahoe suggested the last paragraph be bolded and underlined. <br /> <br />Commissioner Henkel agreed and stated that volumes could be written of how <br />much Chief Oliveira has contributed to the Fire Department over the years. <br /> <br />Chair Taniguchi asked Chief Oliveira if he has any concerns/comments relative to <br />the draft transmittal. <br /> <br />Chief Oliveira replied he appreciates the trust of the Commission and noted that <br />it’s a team effort. <br /> <br />Commissioner Namahoe moved to accept the amended version of the transmittal <br />and disseminate said transmittal to the Mayor. The motion was seconded by <br />Commissioner Henkel and unanimously carried by voice vote. <br /> <br /> <br /> Chief’s response to public testimony of March 9, 2011 <br /> <br />Chief Oliveira requested this item be considered in Executive Session as the <br />circumstances surrounding the comments and events are still subject to <br />disciplinary actions. <br /> <br />Deputy Corporation Counsel Brilhante stated that since this is an unanticipated <br />request to move into Executive Session, a motion would have to be specific to the <br />item to be discussed and incorporated into the motion. <br /> <br />At 10:58 a.m. Commissioner Namahoe moved to enter into Executive Session to <br />hear Chief Oliveira’s response to the March 9, 2011 public testimony. The motion <br />was seconded by Commissioner Stabo and carried unanimously by voice vote. <br /> <br />At 11:12 a.m. Chair Taniguchi called the Regular Session back to order. <br /> <br />Chief Oliveira responded on the two specific questions raised: <br />1) Outdated nature of procedurals manual – the procedurals manual has not <br />been revised but the meat and core of the procedurals manual is still <br />applicable and valid as of today. Updates and revisions have been made <br />over the years as necessary, such as opening of a new company, change <br />in fire response districts or modified policies and procedures. Revisions to <br />the manual have been made, but the entire document has not been <br />completely overhauled. Currently undergoing an internal process with the <br />7 <br /> <br /> <br />