Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit eight illustrates the chronic homeless rates for unaccompanied individuals during the 2011 PIT. The <br />denominators for these calculations are taken to be unaccompanied individuals in emergency shelters for the rural <br />counties and emergency shelters and the safe haven for Oahu. A table for sheltered chronically homeless families <br />was not included due to the fact that there was one family on Oahu and four in the rural counties. <br />Exhibit 8: <br />County <br />Statewide Sheltered Chronically Homeless <br />Unaccompanied Individuals <br />Unaccompanied <br />Chronic Homeless Persons <br />Percent Chronic <br />Oahu <br />389 <br />75 <br />19.3% <br />Maui <br />70 <br />15 <br />21.4% <br />Kauai <br />12 <br />4 <br />33.3% <br />Hawaii <br />37 <br />17 <br />45.9% <br />Total <br />508 <br />111 <br />21.9% <br />Exhibit nine itemizes the number of homeless veterans counted during the 2011 PIT. HUD requires that data on <br />homeless Vets be included in the one day count. <br />Oahu <br />Maui <br />Hawaii <br />Kauai <br />Total <br />Unsheltered Homeless Vets 147 <br />71 <br />53 <br />24 <br />295 <br />Sheltered Homeless Vets 185 <br />10 <br />14 <br />1 <br />210 <br />Total 332 <br />81 <br />67 <br />25 <br />505 <br />Change in Total Statewide Homelessness from 2010 to 2011 <br />The results of the total statewide 2011 PIT count are shown in Exhibit ten. The data indicates that there was a <br />6.1% increase in total homelessness. The statewide number of sheltered homeless increased 2.7% reflecting <br />increased shelter utilization. It should be noted that some shelters are still not at full capacity. The number of <br />unsheltered homeless increased 11.2% which is mainly reflected in the rural county unsheltered increases. <br />2010 <br />2011 <br />Numerical Change <br />Percent Change <br />Unsheltered Homeless 2,299 <br />2,556 <br />+257 <br />+11.2% <br />Sheltered Homeless 3,535 <br />3,632 <br />+97 <br />+2.7% <br />Total 5,834 <br />6,188 <br />+354 <br />+6.1% <br />Recommendations for Future PIT Counts <br />The methodology used in the 2011 Point -in -Time Count was effective for establishing accurate data for the <br />sheltered homeless count; however, there is always room to improve. Improvements can be made to ensure that <br />the most current agency contact information is available to communicate instructions and deadlines for exiting <br />clients and updating the shelter data in the HMIS. Providing the agencies with a designated point -of- contact for <br />questions and troubleshooting can also streamline the shelter count process. An area that could be improved is <br />the ability of some providers to maintain HMIS intake records that match the actual census listing. Some providers <br />13 <br />