Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan: 02. MitigationPlanning

Home

Chapter 2:Mitigation Planning 2.2.1.3 April 2, 2009 Meeting Purpose: Hazard Identification and Profiling Agenda Items: • Develop final survey from review of an initial hardcopy beta distribution • Status Reports on Hazard Risk Identification and Mitigation Projects • Review and improve existing hazard descriptions • Identify who is providing new information and what the next steps should be Preparation for following meetin: • review vulnerability section in preparation for next meeting • locate and bring additional related studies to the next meeting 2.2.1.4 May 7, 2009 Meeting Purpose: Vulnerability Assessment/Development Trends Agenda Items: • Review beta test of the public survey website • Status Reports on Hazard Risk Identification and Mitigation Projects. Continuation from the April meeting on various studies recently completed, underway, or planned that advance the state of knowledge from the 2005 • P1an.Rcview and improve existing vulnerability assessment Preparation for following meeting • each invitee should identify areas that strengthen the island's mitigation efforts: regulations,personnel, funds, etc. 2.2.1.5 June 8, 2009 Meeting Purpose: Capability Assessment Agenda Items: • Discuss ongoing distribution of the public survey • Discuss distributed synopsis of suggested mitigation actions • The mitigation goals and objectives of the current plan was used as a framework to identify and discuss capability gaps. • Identify what the current plan says for hazard identification and mitigation and what remains to be done • identify who is responsible for documenting them Preparation fore ollowing rneetin: • review the entire strategy section and develop draft list of mitigation projects by hazard area per the discussion as well as any newly identified projects/objectives 2.2.1.6 August 17 and 20, 2009 Meeting Purpose: Review Risk Assessment of'County Critical Facilities Agenda Items: • Discuss the HAZUS MH risk assessment that evalauted the expected losses for each building within an inventory of 80 critical county facilities, using features determined from examination of the original construction plans and site visits. Facilities that rank high based on the HAZUS analysis are to be designated for more detailed evaluation and development of recommended mitigation procedures. • Select two groups of buildings from the list with the highest economic and functional vulnerabilities for detailed engineering study and Benefit Cost Analysis of retrofits. 2-5 Hawaii County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan