Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter•5:Hazard Analysis—Tropical Cyclones <br /> regions. However, risk analyses found that the benefits of providing windborne debris <br /> protection for all glazing did not exceed the costs for the relatively low hurricane hazard in <br /> Hawaii. Therefore, the state building code amendments to the 2006 IBC provide designers <br /> with flexibility in allowing Occupancy Category II buildings and some Occupancy Category <br /> ITT buildings (not healthcare or high occupancy facilities) to be designed with unprotected <br /> glazing provided they are designed for the internal pressurization. If a residential building is <br /> not provided with glazing protection then it must have a residential safe room installed which <br /> does have appropriate glazing protection and must satisfy other structural and non-structural <br /> criteria. Public hurricane shelters must also satisfy these criteria. <br /> Where used, debris protection for glazing may be in the form of a transparent protective film, <br /> on the exterior surface or between glazing layers in laminated glass. Alternatively, window <br /> shutters, precut removable plywood panels or another system may be used. Any protective <br /> film or other system must undergo testing based on ASTM E 1996 to verify the required <br /> level of protection. The University of Hawaii has recently started operation of a wind cannon <br /> capable of testing strengthened windows and other debris protective devices to the ASTM <br /> standard. This is intending to increase the local availability of products and ultimately <br /> reduce the cost of providing windbome debris protection to the glazed areas of a structure. <br /> Plywood Shutter Tests <br /> Because the HHRF plywood shutter design had not been tested against any of the three <br /> windborne debris standards discussed in Section 6.1.1, Applied Research Associates <br /> contracted with Dr. Timothy Reinhold of the Wind Load Test Facility at Clemson University <br /> to perform exploratory missile impact and pressure resistance tests on six HHRF storm <br /> panels. Although it was not feasible to conduct the cyclic loading tests specified in the <br /> ASTM standard, the tests did provide valuable information in the impact resistance and <br /> ultimate pressure resistance of the HHRF panels. <br /> The largest missile specified by ASTM, SBCCI, and the SFBC standards is a 9-pound 2x4 <br /> piece of lumber. The missile is projected at the test object using an air canon and strikes the <br /> test object end on, perpendicular to the surface. For residential buildings, the missile impact <br /> speed specified for regions with the highest design wind speeds in the US is 50 feet per <br /> second (34 mph) in all three standards. In order for a product to pass the test, the SFBC <br /> impact standard allows no penetration of the protective system while the SBCCI and ASTM <br /> standards do allow penetration, provided the hole is small enough to prevent a 3 inch sphere <br /> from passing through the hole. The SBCCI and ASTM standards include smaller (lighter) <br /> missiles in regions with lower design wind speeds. For gust speeds between 110 and 130 <br /> mph, the ASTM standard requires that shutters resist a 4.5-pound 2x4 at 40 feet per second <br /> (27 mph). Since Hawaii has a basic design wind speed of 105 mph (gust) in ASCE 7-98, the <br /> design speed falls just below the light missile standard. Consequently, impact protection <br /> systems for Hawaii would need at most according to current standards)to resist the impact of <br /> a 4.5-pound 2x4 traveling at 40 feet pet- second (27 mph). This impact momentum <br /> corresponds to that of a 9-pound 2x4 traveling at 20 feet per second(12 mph). All tests were <br /> conducted using a 9-pound 2x4. In addition to the straight-on missile impact tests, tests were <br /> also conducted with missiles impacting at an oblique angle of 45 degrees. <br /> 5-17 Hawaii County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan <br />