Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MR. BALSIS: Any comments or questions from other members of the board? Arne, any <br />questions? <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: No comments. <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: Glen, do you have any questions? <br /> <br />MR. HISASHIMA: Not right now. <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: May I ask, do we continue with this one and decide on this one, or shall we <br />go through—I have no questions at this time. <br /> <br />MS. SCHOEN: It’s really up to the chair how you want to handle it. Since Mr. Cole is <br />sitting here, you may want to proceed through the other matters and take them all at <br />once. It’s up to you. But again, you are here for initial review of a petition, so the Board <br />needs to decide whether or not it should—needs additional information, or whether or <br />not it will set the matter for some sort of hearing or whether or not it will dismiss the <br />petition. <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: I suggest we take them one at a time, because we won’t have a <br />different board on each one, so we might as well just take them one at a time. <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: Okay. It seems the—from what you have just mentioned, the main <br />contention is the obscuring of information from the agenda. <br /> <br />MR. COLE: No, that is not. The main contention is the fact that a secret document of <br />extortion was submitted to Chairman Dill, and he had communications with other <br />members of the board outside of the Sunshine Law, and the communications were <br />intentioned as an act of extortion to deprive me of my state and federal constitutional <br />rights and freedoms, and therefore was not fair and equal treatment. The action is a <br />criminal action under state and federal law in racketeering. A formal inquiry is what I <br />am requesting so that testimony may be taken and these proceedings may be formalized <br />as sworn and therefore the information proceeded forwarded to the United States <br />authorities, the FBI, the Criminal Division of the U.S. Justice Department, section Public <br />Integrity. The actions of this board constitute a sworn action as an authority under the <br />United States and therefore you are obligated under the United States Code to take <br />action as required to bring forth information to the appropriate authorities criminal <br />activities that become into your awareness. I’m sure that the judge will inform you that’s <br />the case. <br /> <br />MR. BALSIS: I’m taking a moment to re-review the petition. I have reviewed it already, <br />but I want to double-check. Any comments—any further comments from the board? Any <br />proposed action? <br /> <br />MR. HENRICKS: Do you want to discuss it in session, or do you want to go forward? <br />It’s your choice. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br /> <br />