My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan: 07. Earthquakes
PublicDocuments
>
Civil Defense
>
Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan 2010
>
Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan: 07. Earthquakes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2011 4:16:05 PM
Creation date
8/10/2011 4:15:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 7:Hazard Analysis—Earthquakes <br /> up to 1S" were observed at Pier 1, the seawall revetment area between Pier 1 and 2, and as <br /> localized displacement within the sloping fills abutting the piers. <br /> Harbor Building Mitigation Measures <br /> With the evolution of building codes, the evaluation of seismic risk in the Hawaiian Islands <br /> has gone through substantial change in recent years. Many older buildings would not meet <br /> current code requirements for seismic resistance. Harbor buildings that are deemed essential <br /> should undergo a thorough existing conditions evaluation to determine potential seismic <br /> design and/or construction deficiencies. <br /> Wharf and Pier Mitigation Measures <br /> Older wharf and pier structures are typically constructed using non-prestressed vertical and <br /> battered piles. These piles typically do not have the ductility reinforcing and detailing <br /> normally required to resist seismic loads. Four options were identified to improve the lateral <br /> resisting system of the existing wharf structures,including: <br /> • Install a new independent lateral resisting system with new piles carrying all the <br /> lateral loads under the existing deck,tied together. <br /> • Install additional vertical piles to share vertical and horizontal loads with existing <br /> serviceable piles, again tied together. <br /> • Increase the vertical and lateral capacity of existing vertical piles by wrapping piles <br /> in fiber-reinforced polymer(FRP)jackets,with doweled and grouted connections. <br /> • Add continuous anchor blocks behind the wall with tie rods located perpendicular <br /> to the length of the wharf and at opposing 45 degree angles (one in each direction) <br /> to resist both transverse and longitudinal seismic loads. <br /> Geotechnical Foundation Mitigation Measures <br /> Seismic hazards in soils, usually liquefaction or related seismic deformations, can be <br /> mitigated using one or a combination of the following soil treatment or ground improvement <br /> methods: densification, improvement of drainage characteristics, cementing of the soils, or <br /> use of structural elements to resist seismic loads. <br /> Structural foundation mitigation for liquefaction can also be used with or in lieu of ground <br /> improvements. Piles and micropiles have proven effective against liquefaction hazards by <br /> transferring the building loads into non-liquefiable soils, so long as the large horizontal <br /> forces can be adequately carried by the piles. Piles and micropiles are not effective when they <br /> do not sufficiently extend into non-liquefiable soils or where lateral spread is possible, <br /> causing excessively large bending moments in the piles. <br /> Planning <br /> For each port which may serve as a sole lifeline to its supporting communities,FEMA <br /> recommends the following: <br /> • Advocate as a highest planning priority to adopt more current standards or codes. <br /> • Determine site seismicity and surface ground motions for each critical structure <br /> including potential performance, effects of liquefaction and pavement settlements. <br /> 7-11 Hawaii Countv Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.