Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 11:Hazard Analysis—Dam Failures <br /> The dam inspections consisted of the visual only examination or condition survey of the <br /> regulated dam structures, including abutments, spillways, outlet facilities, and reservoir. The <br /> visual assessments yielded conditions ratings that ranged according to the following: <br /> • Satisfactory: Dam is expected to fulfill its intended function. <br /> • Fair: Dam is expected to fulfill its intended function but maintenance is <br /> recommended. <br /> • Poor: Dam may not fulfill its intended function and maintenance/repairs are <br /> necessary. <br /> • Unsatisfactory: Dam is not expected to fulfill its intended function and repair, <br /> replacement, of modification is necessary. <br /> • Unknown: Dam is not visible, not accessible, not inspected, or unable to determine <br /> the condition rating based on the observation taken. <br /> Besides the rating, the report includes recommendations for each facility if any. Typical <br /> recommendations vary from the removal of vegetation to facilitate future inspections to the <br /> requirement of owners to make immediate repair actions to restore the integrity of the <br /> facility. <br /> A total of thirteen dams were inspected in the County of Hawaii. Full summary reports of <br /> these inspections can be found at http://www6.hawaii.)4ov/dlnr/reports/dam-inspections/. <br /> 11.5.2.2 Pacific Disaster Center Dam Failure Inundation Map Project <br /> In 2009, the State of Hawaii DLNR and the Pacific Disaster Center (PDC) engaged in an <br /> effort to generate Dam Failure Inundation Maps for all one-hundred-thirty-five (135) <br /> registered dams in the State of Hawaii. Besides the inundation maps, the project aims at <br /> providing basic damage assessment and social-economical vulnerability assessment. <br /> The inundation maps for this project were produced using MIKE software—one of the <br /> industry standards for simulating flow and water level,water quality and sediment transport <br /> in rivers, floodplains, irrigation canals,reservoirs, and other inland bodies of water. All three <br /> available modules of the MIKE Modeling Suite were used to substantiate the results of the <br /> analyses: MIKE 11 for one-dimensional dynamic modeling of river, channel, and reservoir <br /> hydraulics; MIKE 21 for two-dimensional free surface flow models; and MIKE FLOOD for <br /> the integration of a series of dams within one single model. For illustration purposes, <br /> inundation maps for the same dam based on the two- and three-dimensional modeling <br /> capabilities of MIKE 1 1 and MIKE 21 are shown in Figure 1 1-7. Similarly, Figure 1 1- <br /> illustrates a single model of a series of dams using MIKE FLOOD. <br /> The following failure scenarios and assumptions were use to assure conservatism in the <br /> preparation of the maps: <br /> 11-10 Hawaii County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan <br />