Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan: Plan Review Crosswalk

Home

LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW CROSSWALK LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY The plan cannot be approved if the plan has not been formally adopted. Each SCORING SYSTEM requirement includes separate elements.All elements of the requirement must be Please check one of the following for each requirement. rated"Satisfactory"in order for the requirement to be fulfilled and receive a score of "Satisfactory."Elements of each requirement are listed on the following pages of the N-Needs Improvement: The plan does not meet the minimum for the Plan Review Crosswalk. A"Needs Improvement"score on elements shaded in gray requirement.Reviewer's comments must be provided. (recommended but not required)will not preclude the plan from passing. Reviewer's comments must be provided for requirements receiving a"Needs Improvement" S-Satisfactory: The plan meets the minimum for the requirement. score. Reviewer's comments are encouraged,but not required. Prerequisite(s)(Check Applicable Box) NOT MET MET Mitigation Strategy N S 1. Adoption by the Local Governing Body: X 13.Local Hazard Mitigation Goals:§201.6(c)(3)(i) §201.6(c)(5) OR 14.Identification and Analysis of Mitigation Actions: §201.6(c)(3)(ii) 2. Multi-Jurisdictional Plan Adoption:§201.6(c)(5) NIA 15. Identification and Analysis of Mitigation AND Actions: NFIP Compliance.§201.6(c)(3)(ii) 3. Multi-Jurisdictional Planning Participation:§201.6(a)(3) NIA 16. Implementation of Mitigation Actions: X §201.6(c)(3)(iii) 17. Multi-Jurisdictional Mitigation Actions: NIA Planning Process N S §201.6(c)(3)(iv) 4. Documentation of the Planning Process:§201.6(b) and§201.6(c)(1) Plan Maintenance Process N S 18. Monitoring,Evaluating,and Updating the Plan: Risk Assessment N S §201.6(c)(4)(ii) 19. Incorporation into Existing Planning 5. Identifying Hazards:§201.6(c)(2)(i) X Mechanisms:§201.6(c)(4)(ii) 6. Profiling Hazards:§201.6(c)(2)(i) 20.Continued Public Involvement:§201.6(c)(4)(iii) X 7. Assessing Vulnerability: Overview:§201.6(c)(2)(ii) X 8.Assessing Vulnerability: Addressing Repetitive Additional State Requirements` t* S Loss Properties.§201.6(c)(2)(11) 9. Assessing Vulnerability: Identifying Structures, Insert State Requirement Infrastructure,and Critical Facilities: 201.6 c 2 ii B X § O( )()O Insert State Requirement 10. Assessing Vulnerability: Estimating Potential Losses: §201.6(c)(2)(ii)(B) X Insert State Requirement 11. Assessing Vulnerability: Analyzing Development X Trends:§201.6(c)(2)(ii)(C) 12. Multi-Jurisdictional Risk Assessment:§201.6(c)(2)(iii) NIA LOCAL MITIGATION PLAN APPROVAL STATUS PLAN NOT APPROVED EEI 'States that have additional requirements can add them in the appropriate sections of the Local Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance or create a new section and See Reviewer's Comments modify this Plan Review Crosswalk to record the score for those requirements. PLAN APPROVED J U L Y 1 , 2 0 0 8 (W I D F I R M) See`Summary of Significant Plan Revisions 3 Subsequent to FEMA July 23,2010 Crosswalk."