My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Plastic Bag Reduction Bill Veto Mesage
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Office of the Mayor Documents
>
2008-2016
>
Plastic Bag Reduction Bill Veto Mesage
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2011 4:16:41 PM
Creation date
8/12/2011 4:16:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Review of Plastic vs.Paper Bag LCA Studies Page 5 <br /> VI. SUMMARY <br /> LeQislation designed to reduce environmental impacts and litter by outlawing grocery <br /> bags based on the material from which they are produced will not deliver the intended <br /> results. While some litter reduction might take place, it would be outweighed by the <br /> disadvantages that would subsequently occur (increased solid waste and greenhouse <br /> gas emissions). Ironically, reducing the use of traditional plastic bags would not even <br /> reduce the reliance on fossil fuels, as paper and biodegradable plastic bags consume <br /> at least as much non-renewable energy during their full lifecycle. <br /> Further, an Internet scan of available government and non-profit information for the <br /> United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia indicates that chewing gum and <br /> cigarette butts account for up to 95% of the litter generated in the English-speaking <br /> world." Thus, there would appear to be far better and potentially more effective <br /> legislative opportunities available if the objective is to significantly reduce litter. <br /> Again, when it comes to reducing the environmental and litter impacts of grocery and <br /> merchandise bags, the solution lies in a.) Minimizing the materials used to produce all <br /> types of bags, regardless of their composition, and b.) Building public awareness and <br /> motivation to reduce, reuse and recycle these bags- in that order. <br /> Robert Lilienfeld, Editor <br /> Footnotes <br /> i Com Plastic to the Rescue,by Elizabeth Royte,Smithsonian,August 2006 <br /> (www.smithsonianmag.com/issues/2006/auQust/pla.r)hp?paqe=l). <br /> 2 These figures were provided by a number of experts,but due to the fluctuating dynamics of the composting <br /> industry,no firm citation can be given.One article that mentioned the relative unavailability of industrial and <br /> food composting was Composting that Plastic by Eliza Barclay,Metropolis Magazine,March 1,2004 <br /> (www.metropolismag.com)cda/story.php?artid=153).See also the BioCycle site www,findacomposter.com. <br /> 3 Life Cycle Inventories for Packagings,Volume 1,SAEFL, 1998, Environmental Series 250/1 and Eco- <br /> Profiles of the European Plastics Industry,developed by I.Boustead for PlasticsEurope,March 2005 <br /> (www.plasticseuror)e.org/contenUDefault.asi)?Paae]D=404&IsNewWindow=True). <br /> Ibid and Life Cycle Assessment for Three Types of Grocery Bags-Recyclable Plastic; Compostobte, <br /> Biodegradable Plastic;and Recycled, Recyclable Paper, performed by Boustead Consulting ft Associates <br /> Ltd. for the Progressive Bag Alliance, 2007_ <br /> 28 March 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.