My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Plastic Bag Reduction Bill Veto Mesage
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Office of the Mayor Documents
>
2008-2016
>
Plastic Bag Reduction Bill Veto Mesage
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2011 4:16:41 PM
Creation date
8/12/2011 4:16:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
September 19, 2008 <br /> The Honorable Pete Hoffmann, Chairperson,and Council Members <br /> Page 2 <br /> • Non-profit organizations: no opportunity for input—Bill 326 Draft 2 was passed <br /> without the public having a full understanding of what"businesses"would be affected <br /> by this measure. I watched a recording of the Council's discussion at its August 27 <br /> meeting where this bill passed second and final reading. It was made clear in the <br /> discussion that non-profit organizations such as churches, schools,community groups <br /> and sports teams will also be prohibited from using plastic bags at their fundraisers. <br /> It was also cleat that until the August 27 meeting, even some Council members were <br /> not aware of this impact on non-profit organizations. Not realizing that this bill would <br /> apply to them,non-profit groups did not provide comments and input before the bill's <br /> passage. <br /> On August 1, 2007, Mayor Kim wrote to the Council in another veto message: <br /> "It has always been the goal and policy of this administration to ensure that <br /> whenever any major policy changes are pursued, a forum of some sort is to be <br /> conducted to allow those who would be affected an opportunity to air their <br /> concerns. " <br /> Since non-profit organizations would be impacted by this bill, and it was not clear to <br /> all that they would be impacted,efforts should have been made to solicit input from <br /> these organizations before adoption. <br /> • Small business impacts—While supermarkets and larger retail chains are not happy <br /> about the impact this bill will have on costs to their customers, they have said they will <br /> accept it and live with it. It is our small businesses that will be most harmed by the <br /> higher cost of paper bags. Our small businesses already have a difficult time <br /> competing in the marketplace and cannot take advantage of the same economies of <br /> scale in purchasing as the larger stores. Small businesses that would be negatively <br /> impacted include vendors at farmers' markets, swap meets, and flea markets. It is <br /> noted that this bill would even make it illegal to place goods purchased at garage sales <br /> into reused plastic bags. <br /> These impacts are an unreasonable burden on small businesses. <br /> • Effective date—Bill 326 Draft 2 provides that the ban on plastic bags at point of sale <br /> becomes effective one year after the bill is approved, that is September 2009. This is <br /> not long enough for retailers, especially small businesses, and consumers to prepare to <br /> implement this ban. One local source of plastic and paper bags for about 650 small <br /> business customers provided an example of how this effective date can impact smaller <br /> companies. One customer recently placed an order for custom printed plastic bags. <br /> To obtain a reasonable unit cost, the customer ordered a quantity that will probably <br /> last at least a year and a half. The bags are still in transit, and if a ban takes effect in <br /> one year, this small business will be out money it can ill spare for bags it cannot <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.