Laserfiche WebLink
RC-0442 <br /> PRIOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES <br /> There have been only a few formal archaeological studies conducted in the vicinity of the current project <br /> area. Most of these have occurred within Waipi`o Valley proper (Barrera 1977; Cleghorn and Roger- <br /> .Iourdane 1983;Cordy 1988;Hudson 1932;Loo and Bonk 1970;Stokes 1919),and Cordy(1994)contains a <br /> summary and synthesis of these prior studies.There were two studies conducted in more mauka portions of <br /> Lalakea Ahupua`a that resulting in the discovery of a few sites related to Historic Period ranching and <br /> large-scale irrigation (Corbin 2006; Walker et al. 1991); and there was one study, Head and Goodfellow <br /> (1993)that was conducted for the Hamakua Sugar Company lands that surround the current project area. <br /> Head and Goodfellow (1993)conducted a combination helicopter reconnaissance and limited surface <br /> pedestrian survey, and excavated four test units. Forty-four sites containing 124 features were recorded. <br /> They identified Precontact habitation and agriculture sites as well as Historic Period plantation related sites. <br /> Their 3,770 acre project area bordered the current study parcel and included portions of Lalakea, <br /> Kukuihaele, Kanahonua, Waiko`eko`e, Kea`a, and Kalakala`ula ahupua`a. None of the sites that they <br /> recorded were located in Lalakea Ahupua`a. <br /> CURRENT SURVEY EXPECTATIONS <br /> Based on the location and the specific history of the project area, the results of the background research <br /> (including oral interviews), and a review of archaeological work previously conducted in the general <br /> vicinity,the archaeological expectations for the current study are limited.While it is remotely possible that <br /> Precontact sites may have been present within the current project area, the extensive land use throughout <br /> the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries has significantly altered the landscape.Modern residential use of <br /> the project area with associated movement and construction of residential features appears to date from <br /> only as early as the late 1970s. <br /> ARCHAEOLOGICAL FIELDWORK <br /> On October 31, 2006, Christopher S. Hand, B.A. and Robert B. Rechtman, Ph.D_ carried out the <br /> archaeological fieldwork for the current project. The entire project area was surveyed on-foot, and the <br /> extant residential structures were inspected.The boundaries of the project area were clearly identifiable.No <br /> archaeological resources were identified as a result of the fieldwork,and no evidence was observed that the <br /> area had been or was currently being accessed for the exercise of traditional and customary practices. <br /> CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Given the negative findings of the current study,it is concluded that the transfer of ownership of the current <br /> study parcel to the County of Hawaii and its potential subsequent development will not impact any known <br /> historic properties nor infringe upon any traditional and customary practices. It is therefore recommended <br /> that no further historic preservation work is needed. <br /> 9 <br />