My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-04-18 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Finance Department
>
Property Management Division
>
Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Commission
>
Commission Meeting Information
>
Minutes
>
2005 - 2024
>
2011
>
2011-04-18 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2011 2:24:02 PM
Creation date
8/29/2011 2:24:01 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NEW BUSINESS <br /> Report from commissioners who attended the various Community Development Plan (CDP) <br />Committee meetings in respective districts <br />Ms. Moon reported that she attended the Kona CDP meeting with Ms. Matsumura in Kona along with <br />Ms. Kelepolo who provided hand-outs for the public. There were a few questions in regards to <br />maintenance that was addressed by Ms. Moon. <br />Mr. Hirakami reported that he attended the Puna CDP meeting and noted that Ms. Self was present to <br />answer some questions. He commented that they were very pleased with the information as he <br /> There were questions in regards <br />the Commission looks at when making their consideration. <br />Ms. Markovich reported that she attended the CDP meeting as it was very interesting and <br />since they have a very active community group involved in the maintenance and stewardship. <br />area, maybe a public service announcement could be done sometime in early May to network with <br />Planning Department (PD) and Envision Downtown (ED) 2025. <br />Ms. Self told her that she may want to set something up with Downtown Improvement Association since <br />they work closely with PD. Also the contact person for ED 2025 would be Susan Gagorik at PD. <br /> Commissioners to review and revise the Assessment Criteria Form and discuss the scoring <br />mechanism on how they base their assessment <br />(the commissioners went into discussion) <br />Motion: Commissioner Matsumura moved that we modify the scoring criteria at the top of page 2 <br />to read: 0 equals does not meet, 1 and 2 would remain the same, 3 would equal meets and 4 would <br />equal exceeds criteria. She re-stated the motion to read: <br />0 - does not meet criteria <br />1 - unknown, (needs more assessment/research) <br />2 somewhat (site only partially meets criteria) <br />3 - meets criteria <br />4 - exceeds criteria <br />Seconded by Vice-Chair Markovich. <br />(discussion by commissioners) <br />Motion: Commissioner Matsumura amended her original motion to adjust the total scores for <br />each section. Total of 20 for Criteria 1, total of 16 for Criteria 2 and total of 12 for Criteria 3. <br />Seconded by Commissioner Hirakami; all members voted aye, motion carried. <br />- 3 - <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.