MIN RDC 2011-08-11.tif - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

As stated earlier, we have reviewed all of the publicly available plans. We are strenuously opposed to all plans that try to create a district extending from South Hilo into upper Puna. Likewise, we object to Plan 8, as it creates a gerrymandered District 5 that runs counter to the stated guidelines and goals of this committee. We would like to endorse Plan 9 as being the kind of redistricting scheme the people of Puna deserve. Plan 9 creates a District 5 that runs from Hawaiian Paradise Park down Highway 130 to the ocean, including all points east. Also, a District 4 that includes the towns of Kea'au, Pahoa and Volcano, along with Kurtistown and Mountain View on the south side of Highway 11. These are all communities with similar needs and similar lifestyles. We are all a single community, the community of Puna. Therefore, on behalf of all of the members of "Friend's of Puna's Future," we would urge you to consider and adopt Plan 9 or any plan similar to it, or base your final decision upon the broad strokes outlined by Plan 9, with regard to Puna. CHR. SIRACUSA : The next testifier is James Weatherford, representing himself speaking on Draft Alternate Plans. MR. CARVALHO : Excuse me, madam Chair. I think our last testifier went way over the three minute limit. We have a lot of work to do, so could we limit it to three minutes, please. JAMES WEATHERFORD (At this time James Weatherford came forward to address members of the Commission.) JAMES WEATHERFORD : Good evening Madam Chair and members of the Commission. Thank you for your work on the task on hand. We will be addressing a specific agenda item. I did go on line and create an account and logged on and worked on the software awhile. Being very familiar with Puna, and to a lesser degree with Hilo, I tried a few scenarios using locations in those areas as starting points. One goal I had was to have two complete districts in Puna and I think that needs to happen. As I worked online with the software for awhile, two things became clear to me. The first, which I had already suspected, while the numbers are there, the population distribution and community boundaries make it difficult, but not impossible, to get two reasonable districts in Puna. The second, which I should have suspected, but did not, was my own ignorance about West HawaiÒi communities which I would be applying to the district boundaries on the other side of the island, and the equal ignorance that someone over there would be applying to working on Puna and Hilo boundaries. With that said, there are among some of the nine plans, some common problems that exist. They all deal with the community that IÓm most familiar with, near where I live. I would encourage all of you to really take that concept on board. Plans number 1, number 2, number 3, number 7, and number 9 all violate the principal of not dividing communities of interest. The others may also, but I know that those five plans do. With Plans 1, 2, and 3, they just chop Hawaiian Paradise Park in half or a big piece out of it. But Plans number 7 and number 9 use Highway 130 as the principal district boundary. This is an unacceptable division of communities because part of both Hawaiian Paradise Park and part of MakuÒu Hawaiian Homelands are on the mauka side of Highway 130, 5