Laserfiche WebLink
already mentioned, they definitely deserve that we be there when the public hearing part of this <br />exercise begins. <br /> <br />MR. CARVALHO: Can I say something from Waimea? <br /> <br />CHR. SIRACUSA <br />: Yes, please. <br /> <br />MR. CARVALHO <br />: Seeing this request, I am all for it. I think we have a duty to report what we <br />know about Redistricting to our constituents. The only reservation I have is like Mr. Udovic <br />says, if we would get into some kind of arguments with people, which we shouldnÓt even <br />approach anything like that. As Commissioners, I believe that we should be educating the public <br />as much as we can until we get to the public hearings. I have already had many comments from <br />our Waimea people who are in District 1 and they want to be back in District 9. I am talking to <br />people now; I hope itÓs not wrong. At least they have an ear to talk to and I think that is part of <br />our duty as Commissioners. <br /> <br />CHR. SIRACUSA <br />: Thank you. <br /> <br />MR. MIDDLESWORTH <br />: Each of us represents a Council district and I would suggest that these <br />requests be channeled to the Commissioner whose districts in which these meetings are being <br />held and leave it up to them to decide whether they want to respond and do, as Joe says, do the <br />right thing, or ignore them. <br /> <br />CHR. SIRACUSA <br />: I would tend to agree with that, I also feel that if we did some meetings and <br />then stopped doing it, then the other people would say, ÐWhat about us, are we chopped liver, <br />how come you did it for them but you wonÓt do it for us?Ñ So we need to have a level playing <br />field for everybody. Having the Commissioner whose district the meeting is in agree to attend <br />that meeting means one Commissioner, and that addresses the whole Sunshine Law issues, and it <br />means that Commissioner is dealing with people in his own district and can respond most <br />knowledgeably to the concerns that might be raised, and still not make any commitments to <br />anything but let people know what the process is and clarify any misunderstandings. It is <br />basically public education that we are talking about. Does everybody feel comfortable with a <br />process like that? <br /> <br />MR. MELROSE: I would tend to agree. I think when we get formal action, it shouldnÓt be a <br />formal action of the Commission. My suggestion is that we get into the habit of channeling them <br />to the people in those districts, because obviously there is an interest. If they are able to attend <br />that meeting, then so be it. If not, then later on. If Joe is willing to go to the Kawaihae meeting, <br />that is good. I agree with that. I would just add that part of this process is not just teaching, but <br />listening. So, the question to ask is, ÐWhat concerns to you have? What are the things that I can <br />help you understand better?Ñ The fact is, the numbers are going to dictate this process. This is <br />not something we can just say, ÐThis is something that I am going to deliver for you guys.Ñ The <br />numbers are going to tell us how to do that. It would be really good to go to that meeting with <br />the web site and with some encouragement or some insight on how to do that software and show <br />them how to go get information and go get involved. There were several people at that meeting; <br />I think there were ten at that Resource meeting when I went to it last month. There were several <br />21 <br /> <br />