My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-06-13 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Finance Department
>
Property Management Division
>
Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Commission
>
Commission Meeting Information
>
Minutes
>
2005 - 2024
>
2011
>
2011-06-13 Public Access, Open Space and Natural Resources Preservation Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2011 11:10:56 AM
Creation date
9/13/2011 10:46:38 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Markovich asked why the surfers access the ocean from the beach area fronting the <br />and the waves are breaking <br />right in front. The only access is fronting KBK. <br /> <br />Ms. Byrne Baber wanted to clarify that the seawall is 6 feet high not 6 feet wide. Ms. McMichael <br /> <br /> <br />Ms. Moon thanked Ms. McMichael for her testimony. <br /> <br />JANICE PALMA-GLENNIE <br /> <br />Ms. Janice Palma-Glennie spoke on behalf of the Surfrider Foundation, Kona Kai Ea Chapter, and <br />closing beach shoreline access off at sunset to the public. <br /> <br />She wanted to comment on some questions that was raised earlier for regarding the two <br /> Their entitlements to build on the top mauka TMK, approximately 85 acres was due to a land <br />swap with NELHA about 10 years ago as it was one parcel before that. There are conservation <br />entitlements on the rest of the 181 acres makai of that area. Also, in the plan that Beachside <br />Village proposed that was turned down by the LUC, they had shown an 1100 foot setback of open <br />space but within that area there was a large parcel that they wanted to have urbanized. <br /> <br />She strongly re-iterated that is conservation designated whereas Kohanaiki was already in <br />resort zoning and till this day the water quality is suffering <br />there yet. Various groups such as Kohanaiki Ohana, Sierra Club and have fought so <br />man area. <br /> <br />There needs to be a larger buffer and with the heavy use of the Kohanaiki area by campers, if the <br />County acquired the campsites could be set back away from the shoreline. In the Kona CDP, <br />it was clear that no more conservation coastal space be developed as the community wants that area to <br />be preserved. <br /> <br />She then read a written testimony of support (letter dated June 6, 2011 attached to 6/13/11 PONC <br />minutes) <br /> <br />Ms. Markovich asked so they have approximately 300 acres. Ms. Palma-Glennie replied that the two <br />parcel that is conservation designated is close to 200 and was <br />appraised at 2 million. <br /> <br />Ms. Byrne Baber asked if the application is for both parcels. Ms. Palma-Glennie replied yes. <br /> <br />Ms. Palma-Glennie thanked the commissioners for their work hard. <br /> <br />Recess: 11:14 a.m. <br />Reconvened: 11:21 a.m. <br /> <br />- 4 - <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.