Laserfiche WebLink
We understand that a plan submitted as public testimony by Margaret Wille was accepted at the last meeting and <br />worked on during that meeting by the full commission, the result of which was Plan 40, advanced by this commission. <br />Plan 40, however, excludes much of Volcano, and it divides Hawaiian Paradise Park, making it unacceptable to us. <br />Friends of Puna's Future was also invited by Ms. Wille to use her plan as a template for District 9, and the result of <br />that effort was the timely submission of Plan 27, which was rejected by this commission despite the fact that it <br />presented the only map thus far submitted that created two Puna districts divided mauka makai that included Kea'au, <br />Volcano, Pahoa, and all the other communities of Puna without dividing Hawaiian Paradise Park. <br />In preparation for this public hearing, we began working on a revision of Plan 27, on behalf of our members, that <br />consolidates the best aspects of Plan 40 and our original Plan 27 (submitted as fopf5.plan). Ms. Wille has also <br />recently revised her own submitted testimony, throwing her support behind our revision of Plan 27, with minor <br />adjustments to District 2 (submitted as 40 adj 10 -9 w /FoPF & Dist2adjs.plan. See Margaret Wille's testimony to the <br />commission, attached). As this submission so closely resembles our own submission, we endorse this plan <br />completely and urge you to consider and adopt this plan. <br />40 adj 10 - -9 w /FofPF & Dist2adjs. plan <br />