My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-09-21 Merit Appeals BoardMinutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2011
>
2011-09-21 Merit Appeals BoardMinutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2011 8:36:30 AM
Creation date
10/18/2011 8:36:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Chair Yoshiyama called the regular meeting to order at 9:30 a.m. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES OF JULY 27, 2011 <br /> <br />MOTION: Mr. De Lima moved that the minutes of July 27, 2011 be <br />approved as amended. The motion was seconded by Mr. Silva <br />and unanimously carried. <br /> <br /> <br />OLD BUSINESS <br /> <br />A) Proposed amendments to Administrative Rules <br /> <br />Chair Yoshiyama noted that action on the above had been taken care of at <br />the public hearing. <br /> <br /> <br />UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br /> <br />A)Formulate procedures for annual evaluations of the <br /> <br />Director of Human Resources <br /> <br />Mr. Takahashi recalled that at the last meeting, the Board had asked for <br />his goals and objectives for the department. He and Ms. Toriano met and <br />developed documents containing the mission statement and goals for the Board’s <br />consideration. They reviewed the materials that were presented by Mr. De Lima <br />and Mr. Silva and came up with a suggested recommendation that was “short <br />and sweet.” <br /> <br />The Board recessed at 9:33 a.m. to review the document and reconvened <br />at 9:35 a.m. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Rowe noted that he didn’t see anything about communication <br />and policy development, to which Ms. Toriano explained that that could overlap <br />into planning, prioritizing, organizing, problem solving, decision making, and <br />leadership. When she thought about how they would measure each of these <br />performance categories, she couldn’t help but think that at some point, they are <br />going to have to survey the users, the department directors. Therefore, in that <br /> 4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.