Laserfiche WebLink
year. Mr. De Lima likes the concept of identifying obtainable goals that the <br />director can be judged by, and he think it’s much fairer to the director as well. <br /> <br />Mr. Silva suggested putting a time element on this, maybe of three years, <br />to see if it works, or if it needs modification, etc., and revisit the process. <br /> <br />Ms. Toriano noted that when looking at the goals, in particular the last <br />one on the second page, performance feedback from department directors is <br />huge in evaluating the achievement of this goal. She would ask for the Board’s <br />assistance to come back and visit the process. <br /> <br />Chair Yoshiyama stated that he certainly appreciates having clear goals <br />and the evaluation form being straightforward and clear. He questioned the <br />“how to” in getting feedback. The questionnaire that was given to all <br />departments back in 2006-2007 did not produce much feedback, so his question <br />would be how do they get the information out and get feedback so that they can <br />do the evaluation. <br /> <br />Mr. Silva requested that the director and deputy design such a form, bring <br />it back to the Board, and the Board will send it out to the department heads <br />asking for a response by a certain date. <br /> <br />Mr. De Lima suggested surveying the union people that are involved in <br />negotiations. If the people Mr. Takahashi is negotiating with thinks he’s a fair <br />and evenhanded person, that’s something the Board should take into account. <br />Another thing he thought about was randomly selecting applicants who deal <br />with the office and sending them a form. While the director is not actually the <br />person they deal with, it might be good feedback for the office. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Rowe agreed with doing something like that in terms of <br />surveying the recruitment consumer, noting that only about 10-15% are going to <br />respond. Along the same note, he stated that there are free online surveys that <br />can be emailed to people. <br /> <br />MOTION: Mr. De Lima moved to adopt the evaluation process as <br />outlined in their discussion. The motion was seconded by <br />Mr. Silva. <br /> <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> 6 <br /> <br />