Laserfiche WebLink
masfzm PL .AN— HI.L0, HAIR -.All <br />other open spaces, the density of population and the <br />uses of buildings, structures and land for trade, indus- <br />try, residences, recreation, public activities and other <br />purposes." <br />Regulations are designed "to lessen traffic conges- <br />tion; to secure safety from fire, panic and other dan- <br />gers; to promote health and the general welfare; to <br />provide adequate light and air; to prevent the over- <br />crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of <br />population; to facilitate the adequate provision of <br />transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and <br />other public improvements." <br />In unincorporated towns and villages, in areas ad- <br />jacent to but beyond the boundaries of municipalities <br />and in ribbon developments along the highways —and <br />in rural areas — zoning has substantially similar ob- <br />jectives. <br />APPLICATION IN HAWAII. —It remains for legal au- <br />thorities to establish the necessary degree of com- <br />pliance with the above general Mainland pattern of the <br />relationships of planning and zoning and our govern- <br />mental setup with a view of distinction, if any, between <br />the provisions of State sovereignty and those of our <br />Organic Act, a law of Congress. <br />We have as the opinion of the Office of the Terri- <br />torial Attorney General the following: <br />"Inasmuch as in a problem of this nature it is <br />best that every vestige of legal doubt be removed, <br />and inasmuch as it can best be handled under ex- <br />press statute defining precisely the breadth and ' <br />limits of the power, it is best that the matter be <br />brought to the Legislature's attention. Hence, any <br />opinion at this time would be premature. The <br />problem has not actively arisen as yet, and it <br />might never arise if the Legislature acts in the <br />matter." <br />Accordingly, with our desire to proceed constitu- <br />tionally along these lines, a planning - zoning enabling <br />act has been prepared and published in our -Second <br />Progress Report (Publication No. 11). This suggested <br />form of the enabling act is based on the most recent <br />legislation now being evolved in State planning fields, <br />and in the Mainland courts. Particular reference is <br />made to pages 7 and 8 of that report in regard to its <br />broader provisions. A bill has been prepared for the <br />consideration of the Legislature as an administrative <br />suggestion of planning- zoning enabling provision. <br />In. view of the fact that the Legislature by an allot - <br />tnent in the general appropriation bill provided funds <br />for the preparation, by this Board of Master Plans <br />for centers of population of the Territory, the mandate <br />has the effect of an enabling act for the specific cases <br />14 <br />of Hilo and Kapaa. In the case of our Hanapepe Plan, <br />the status requires further legal clarification. There <br />we were requested by the Board of Supervisors of the <br />County of Kauai to assist in the preparation of a <br />Master Plan and such was prepared in collaboration <br />with the implemented local Town -Plan Collaborating <br />Committee. To cover all possible classifications of <br />origin of Master Plans to be prepared in the Terri- <br />tory, in view of the questions involved, it is opportune <br />that the question of enabling legislation in both plan- <br />ning and zoning be respectfully submitted for the con- <br />sideration of the Legislature at this time. <br />THE COURSE OF THE MASTER PLAN. —The Master <br />Plans prepared under the direction of this Board —of <br />different natures of origin —will now receive the atten- <br />tion of (a) the Legislature, in the case of Kapaa; and <br />(b) the Board of Supervisors of the County of Kauai in <br />the case of Hanapepe. In the legislative consideration of <br />the Kapaa Plan will arise the question of appropriation <br />for flood control,& while the Hanapepe Plan was prepared <br />to assist in a controversial situation and the Master Plan <br />is already a desired instrument of solution of an impasse. <br />In the case of Hilo there is a similarity to that of the <br />Town of Hanapepe, except that the origin was in the <br />Legislature instead of in the County. As such, it is a <br />legislative mandate for the largest municipality within <br />,the counties outside of the City of Honolulu. <br />It now remains to consider the course of any master <br />plan. Who is the custodian; of the Plans prepared for <br />Hanapepe, Kapaa., and Hilo? It is respectfully sub- <br />mitted that the purppse of the three Master Plans <br />prepared were: <br />(1) To furnish information to the Legislature for con- <br />sideration in connection with an appropriation; or <br />(2) To provide the County. Board of Supervisors with <br />an instrumentality of planning for the Village, <br />Town or City. <br />In regard to the manner of use by the County of <br />the Territorially and County - prepared Village, Town. <br />or City Master Plan, it is further respectfully sub- <br />mitted, since it is not advisable to adopt a Master <br />Plan which must be kept a flexible instrument of the <br />future, that the Legislature and the County Board of <br />Supervisors respectively approve (not adopt) the Plan <br />and that the County Engineer be requested to prepare <br />a map on a larger scale, with precise dimensions and <br />other usual details, for such part of the Master Plan <br />as the Board of Supervisors may deem desirable and <br />necessary to adopt as their Official Map. <br />a Perhaps cooperatively with the District Engineer, U. S. Army. <br />