My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN RDC 2011-09-23.tif
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2011 Redistricting Commission
>
Minutes
>
MIN RDC 2011-09-23.tif
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2011 9:16:17 AM
Creation date
10/24/2011 3:49:54 PM
Metadata
Document Relationships
MIN RDC 2011-09-23
(Original Version)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Redistricting Commission\2011 Redistricting Commission\Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MR. KAHUI: For us West guys, I would agree to that boundary; at least for discussion. <br />MR. KANUHA: Can you move down to the southern boundary, between District 7 and 6? <br />MR. MELROSE: _I think the boundary is coming down a drainage way. That's not bad. <br />MR. KANUHA: Can you change the base map. Linda, do you have comments on this boundary? <br />MS. UGALDE: On District 6, in the Ka`u area, I must admit I don't know a lot about where that <br />is falling. It seems alright to me; it's only the other end that I am more concerned about. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Speaking about the other end, the interface there with Council Districts 3, 4, <br />and 5; if we move that line up towards Volcano, then we can include more of the greater Volcano <br />area in what would be Council District 4 here. <br />MR. KANUHA: Hold on, I really wasn't finished. I'm just trying to look at this in my mind and <br />see if it is an acceptable boundary or not. It does exclude some houses on either side; I don't <br />think the communities - - -Can you zoom in Shyla? Personally, I don't think this is an issue, so it is <br />acceptable and we can definitely work on it for future. Okay, Rene, you can go ahead now. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Thank you. Can we go over there back to Council District 4 and look at <br />where it joins up to Districts 3 and 5? Patrick, do you want to guide her and see how we can <br />move some of that into Council District 3? <br />MR. MELROSE: Can I just ask a point of order? I know that we are going to want to keep <br />amending different pieces to make them right, but I think what we are trying to do, since we have <br />nine more plans to go through, and if we are going to amend each one before we get it ready - - -Is <br />the tendency to want to accept this plan? Is that where we are headed? <br />MR. KAHAWAIOLA`A: It's not a matter of rejecting. I would tend to move with the train of <br />thought that Mr. Melrose raises. Because of the other ten maps that we have to look at, I would <br />not want to say that this is something that has got to be done now or amended. I think as a matter <br />of discussion, right now I've heard maybe two or three Commissioners representing their <br />particular districts with this particular map; they say they can live with it. So I would like to <br />make a suggestion that we use this map as a work in progress. <br />Mr. Kahawaiola' a moved to keep Plan _3 0. <br />Seconded by Mr. Middlesworth and carried <br />by the following vote: <br />Ayes: Commissioners Kahawaiola`a, Kahui, <br />Kanuha, Middlesworth, Ugalde and <br />Chair Siracusa. <br />Noes: Commissioners Melrose and Poindexter. <br />Absent: Commissioner Carvalho. <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.