Laserfiche WebLink
community in Waikoloa, or Waimea, may have. So, I would like to ask you to please reconsider <br />some of these plans that you have. You may end up with something different, something like <br />someone said where more communities will be together and not split. Thank you. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Thank you. Our next testifier is Mike Price. <br />MIKE PRICE <br />(At this time Mike Price came forward to address members of the Commission.) <br />MR. PRICE: I'm Mike Price, I'm from Waikoloa; I want to thank you for being on this <br />commission, because no matter what you do, you're going to end up (inaudible) somebody's <br />(inaudible) and that's a tough job. I wanted to emphasize what you already heard in a lot of cases. <br />Kohala is an historic district and the set up is an ahupua` a, and that included the ocean all the <br />way. Many still live that way. We went through a three year process with the community <br />development program developing a shared vision for the area. I hate to see all that lost by <br />splitting communities and drawing lines and dibbing things up. Some of the people who have <br />contributed some of the best ideas would get left out, and in the district they're going into, their <br />plan that we covered won't deal with some of the issues that are important to them. Puako is a <br />good example, Waikoloa is another one. I disagree with splitting any community. I'm involved <br />with the South Kohala traffic safety committee, and over the years it's always been a problem <br />with part of Waimea being in another district and expecting representation from that district on <br />pertinent issues in Waimea. So holding communities together is utmost important. I think you <br />have a historic district, and there is an issue of sustainability and connectivity. <br />All the roads in the district either coming from Hawi down the mountain road tying in, or when <br />you look at the Kawaihae road, you have got to be very careful about splitting jurisdiction over <br />that, otherwise we will not get any improvements. The Kawaihae bypass has been in the works <br />since 1968. You split the jurisdiction and I think you already heard that going to two different <br />councilman to get support for even a State project, if it shows even an inkling of non - consensus in <br />the area, someplace else in the State will be funded. That's my concern. But when look at the <br />roads in Kohala, I don't think that you can start moving people and population into districts that <br />they don't even have a connecting road to the area. I think that's really under representing those <br />folks. How will they get improvements to their infrastructure? That's a big concern of mine. <br />When I looked at all of the maps, I also thought about the fact that we've entered in a period of <br />recession, and depending on who you read and in what newspaper, we may now not recover until <br />2013 at the earliest or 2018 at the latest. That means that where we're at right now, growth wise, <br />in South Kohala it's stopped. Why not leave this district, or some other district, in other words; <br />leave district alone. The water is coming from either the reservoirs of Kohala Mountains or else <br />Mauna Kea and is distributed downhill. The same with the roads and what is actually printed out <br />in the CDP, so please considerate it. Thank you. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Thank you very much. Our next testifier is Victor Morris. <br />VICTOR MORRIS <br />(At this time Victor Morris came forward to address members of the Commission.) <br />7 <br />