MIN RDC 2011-10-17 PH-KONA CHAMBERS.tif

Home

STATEMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC CHR. SIRACUSA: Our first testifier is Margaret Willie of Waimea testifying on her own behalf. MARGARET WILLE (At this time Margaret Wille came forward to address members of the Commission.) MS.WILLE: Margaret Willie, Waimea. I submitted testimony which you may have gotten a copy of. This is a revision of map, Plan _40. It's identical to Plan _40 adjusted that Friends of Puna's Future submitted last week, or Saturday. Other than that it adjusts the lines for District 6/7 boundary, and District 7/8 boundaries. It also extends District 2 all the way along Saddle Road instead of having a portion of District 6 extend up to Saddle Road in the center section of that road. We have been trying to work with different community groups around the island on this, and let the different local areas work on it, and even since this plan came up, been working on further adjustments for the 7/6 boundary because what I've submitted splits Hokulia community and so we've worked on that. The idea of this plan is that it is not perfect for any district, but it's not terrible for any area, that's the point. It's not as you say, some maps are really good for some areas and bad. We have been trying to just get a lot of community input on it and working with the neighborhoods and shared visions and interests that are coming up over the next decade, particularly in the way of water issues and road issues and those other shared issues besides just neighborhoods. There is one concern that has been expressed to me or one criticism that I don't agree with, so I just wanted to mention that; and that's perhaps the rural districts, large ones should be a higher population under the principle that if practical, areas that may be low sort of the high growth areas, should be kept on the low end and the low populations that may not move should be kept high. I consider that, if practical, criteria to often be in conflict with the shared interest; and I think that where you need to make a choice between those, you should go where you're keeping the shared interest together. I also think that in terms of practicality making say the Ka'u or Hamakua areas larger, is also impractical in terms of one person representing that area as well, so I bring that up. Lastly, I just want to say that I think in terms of maps that I'm concerned about would probably be map 17 in terms of how it splits the different North Kohala with South Kohala and makes a large portion of Hamakua would become combined with Downtown Hilo; and I could go around the map on that. I do think there is a question in terms of Waimea, there are other maps that might be better if I only looked at Waimea, and what's best just for Waimea, and how does one deal with keeping North and South Kohala versus say whether we include Lakeland. I came down on that; I feel that you either knock out Waikoloa, or the bottom half of South Kohala, and bring in Lakeland, which isn't in part of District 9 right now. Or, you leave Lakeland, get as close to that area, Mud Lane area as you can, and leave it in District 1 as part of the rural Hamakua district so Hamakua doesn't go into or doesn't need to go into Hilo. I think that Lakeland's interests are very similar to the rest of East Waimea and are generally taken into account. When we worked on the shuttle bus, we did it from Lakeland, we include 3