My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN RDC 2011-10-11 PH-PAHOA.tif
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2011 Redistricting Commission
>
Minutes
>
PUBLIC HEARINGS
>
MIN RDC 2011-10-11 PH-PAHOA.tif
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2012 11:35:02 AM
Creation date
10/28/2011 2:25:55 PM
Metadata
Document Relationships
MIN RDC 2011-10-11 PH-PAHOA
(Original Version)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Redistricting Commission\2011 Redistricting Commission\Minutes\PUBLIC HEARINGS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATEMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Please speak close to the microphone. <br />LEILANI BRONSON <br />(At this time Leilani Bronson came forward to address members of the Commission.) <br />MS. BRONSON: Thank you. My name is Leilani Bronson, and I would like to say a personal <br />aloha to my friend, Jeffrey Melrose. It has been 45 years, I'm sure. Thank you for this time, <br />madam Chair. I only have one point, having reviewed very quickly some of the plans that have <br />come forward. I would like to make a very strong and emphatic statement that Hawaiian Paradise <br />Park Subdivision, which you know is one of the oldest, substandard and second largest in the <br />nation, should remain intact under all circumstances. We are comprised of 8,835 lots; we cover <br />about twelve square miles. We have about five miles of road frontage on the State Highway. <br />Thank you. <br />CHR. SIRACUSA: Our next testifier is James Weatherford, also representing himself. <br />JAMES WEATHERFORD <br />(At this time James Weatherford came forward to address members of the Commission.) <br />MR. WEATHERFORD: Thank you very much. My testimony is very parallel to my written <br />testimony. I want to share a few things that I learned in my own experience using the online <br />software. Just three points, if you will; One, is I do believe a logical district can be created <br />around each of the two major commercial districts on the island, downtown Hilo and Kailua -Kona <br />Village, the most densely populated places. Two, there are logical council district boundaries to <br />be created at the Hilo /Hamakua boundary, the Puna /Ka`u boundary, and the Kona /Kohala <br />boundary, as one of the commissioners early on in the process suggested these original judicial <br />districts offer a logical course. The third point is the entirety of Ka`u and the entirety of South <br />Kona combined together do make a sufficient and logical council district. Now, regarding my <br />own community, the entirety of Hawaiian Paradise Park must be kept together in a single council <br />district. It is well known that the population of Puna has grown. According to the 2010 census, <br />Hawaiian Paradise Park has led that growth with approximately two - thirds of the 8,800 lots <br />existing, only two - thirds of those 8,800 have been built on. This is 25% of the Puna population <br />and this subdivision is poised to continue to grow more rapidly than the rest of them. <br />Many of the maps have left off two smaller parts of Hawaiian Paradise Park. They have left off <br />several places on the Hilo side of Shower Drive, and on the mauka side of Highway 130. At least <br />one map, originally, cut the community in half. Census blocks are configured such that the <br />entirety of Hawaiian Paradise Park can be kept together in a single council district. Here is the <br />real point; dividing any part of Hawaiian Paradise Park into separate council districts, in my <br />opinion, violates Chapter 36 of the Hawaii County Code, which requires keeping together a <br />community of common interest. Hawaiian Paradise Park is an incorporated community, having <br />exact boundaries and there are owner /members who share common interests that include road <br />maintenance, neighborhood security, common ownership of real property and indeed, bond <br />indebtedness. The fringes of communities with less exact boundaries allow flexibility to modify <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.