My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
COMM. 48.8 from B Ford re BJF Hybrid Plan
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2011 Redistricting Commission
>
Communications
>
COMM. 48.3 BFJ Hybrid Plan
>
COMM. 48.8 from B Ford re BJF Hybrid Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2011 9:01:03 AM
Creation date
10/28/2011 2:50:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 27, 2011 <br />Re: suggested change in draft plan for redistricting <br />Aloha Commissioners, <br />I've listened to the comments made by many residents regarding redistricting and the <br />various plans submitted. Many people are angry despite your best efforts to create a fair <br />and legal plan. No matter how you divide the island, some locations will be split, either <br />the geographical region or the community. Since the commission chooses to keep <br />"communities of interest" together as much as possible — which is laudable, please be <br />very sure to write a justification for each district explaining what the district gains and <br />loses from that decision. Additionally, I suggest that you choose those criteria that seem <br />to support the "most" people in the various regions, realizing that no one and no district <br />is going to completely happy. You are doing the best that you can. <br />In an effort to assist, I am submitting a map. Although the district deviations are much <br />higher than I like, each district is within the +/- 4.99 %, and the total deviation is less <br />than 10 %. A total deviation greater than 10% is illegal on its face and voidable by the <br />U.S. Supreme Court. Please don't make this error. Consider how everyone would feel if <br />a disinterested third party (a judge or special master) divided the island just by the <br />numbers — every district would lose. <br />These are the pros and cons of my plan: <br />1. Hilo has 2 districts. Kaumana stays with Hilo. <br />2. Puna has 2 districts. <br />3. Almost all Puna residents that need to be assigned to another district are in the <br />Volcano area which I have assigned to be with Ka`u, South Kona, and southern <br />North Kona. Basically, Volcano, both upper and lower, will stay in the same <br />district where it has been for at least 10 years. Attempting to put Volcano in a <br />Puna district means a third district for Hilo populated by many Puna residents and <br />potentially controlled by Hilo. Volcano could be with Hilo, Puna, or Ka`u. I <br />chose Ka'u as the least objectionable of those three alternatives. You must decide <br />where Volcano would hate to be the most... and eliminate that possibility. <br />4. Kailua Village remains in one district because of the Business Improvement <br />District and other characteristics the residents share in that region. <br />5. District 8 is the northern area of North Kona. Also, access to Saddle Road is from <br />District 8 as appropriate and continues across the island to the Hilo boundary. <br />6. District 9 contains Waikoloa Village and most of Waimea excluding the Lakeland <br />area. (Sorry, the population of Kohala is too large - someone must move east or <br />south, and the public has been adamant about Waikoloa NOT being assigned to <br />Kona.) <br />COMM. 48.8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.