My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MIN RDC 2011-11-03.tif
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2011 Redistricting Commission
>
Minutes
>
MIN RDC 2011-11-03.tif
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2011 10:26:31 AM
Creation date
11/18/2011 12:19:25 PM
Metadata
Document Relationships
MIN RDC 2011-11-03
(Original Version)
Path:
\County Clerk - Council\County Clerk\Redistricting Commission\2011 Redistricting Commission\Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JAMES WIL,LOCK <br />(At this time James Willock came forward to address members of the Commission.) <br />MR. WIL,LOCK Good morning, thank you. I certainly have a lot of respect and <br />compassion for what you are trying to do today. I'll tell you. My name is Jim Willock, <br />and I am the General Manager of Waik6loa Village Association. I am also a home owner <br />in Waik6loa Village. The Waik6loa Village Association represents about 96% of roughly <br />8,000 people in the village. So, we go a little bit beyond just a normal association. We <br />need Plan _40. We need it for a variety of reasons. Most of them were already addressed to <br />you both verbally and in the written testimony. What I find interesting is that I have not <br />been able to find one written testimony or I haven't heard one verbal testimony that is <br />supporting Plan A, yet Plan _A remains on the table. Please don't tweak Plan _A to try and <br />make it work for the politicians; make it work for the folks; make it work for the voters, the <br />people who put the politicians in place. I have lived, worked, and been actively involved in <br />both Waik6loa and Kona for a large number of years now, so I know both communities <br />very, very well. I think that we, in Waik6loa, share significant common interests and a <br />sense of community with Waimea. Waimea is our community, it's our town; it is where <br />we live away from our homes, where we shop, where we go to the doctor. We think of <br />Waimea as our town. I think somebody said when we go to Kona we only go to the airport <br />and Costco; and I had to laugh, because that is pretty much what we find our way going to <br />Kona. Kona has an entirely different community feel, it has an entirely different set of <br />needs, entirely different set of issues. <br />The CDP is a huge issue as well, but it is important that we remain part of this community <br />in South Kohala and in Waimea. I think that I have a unique take on it because of my <br />position with the association, besides being just a homeowner. I spend a considerable <br />amount of my time working with our County representative, and I find that working with a <br />representative that knows what our needs are, what our wants are, makes it a lot easier than <br />to try to work with someone who is going to try and put their focus into the larger <br />community. I have been involved in and out of the political arena for many, many years of <br />my life and I have to tell you, that is human nature, you are going to go where the votes are. <br />That is just the way it's going to be. They were talking a little bit about the DOE and the <br />school; you were asking about the schools earlier. The DOE has a plan to build a high <br />school that is going to be the high school for Waimea and for Waik6loa; not for Kona and <br />Waik6loa, but for Waimea and Waik6loa. They recognize that we are a community in <br />Waimea and Waik6loa, and that is the way the high school will be built when it is built, by <br />the department of understanding. <br />You know, I understand that you have a difficult task, and you have numbers that you have <br />got to reach. I fully understand that, but this is not a numbers issue to us who live in the <br />homes. This is a people issue, and I think we need to focus on the people here and not on <br />the numbers. We can make the numbers work with Plan 40; with the hybrid. I fully <br />understand the Lakeland issue, but I support Pete's comments, don't try to help a few <br />people by harming a lot. Let me finish by pointing out that not one testifier, again, written <br />or verbal, has supported Plan A, and I find it quite surprising that it is even still on the <br />table and my concern is that you might have a desire to tweak that plan to continue to keep <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.